Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: ACME Metal Company Recommendation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
ACME Metal Company Recommendation
ACME Metal Company Recommendation
Recommendations for treating wastewater created by the ACME Metal Company Expansion Facility.
Rubric Code:
C576X2
By
mschlager
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project/Presentation
Exceeds (21-25)
25 pts
Proficient (16-20)
25 pts
Below (11-15)
25 pts
Unsatisfactory (0-10)
25 pts
Visual Content
Exceeds (21-25)
The presentation format includes at least 2 visuals that enhance treatment recommendations. Includes an overview of recommendations described in explicit detail.
Proficient (16-20)
The presentation format includes 2 visuals that explain the treatment recommendations. Includes an overview of recommendations described in detail.
Below (11-15)
The presentation format includes 1 visual that assists in explaining treatment recommendations. Includes some description of recommendations.
Unsatisfactory (0-10)
The presentation format does not include visuals and has little or no explanation of recommendations.
Work quality and effort
Exceeds (21-25)
The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the learner is proud of his/her work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learner.
Proficient (16-20)
The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this presentation.
Below (11-15)
Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.
Unsatisfactory (0-10)
Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
Knowledge of Concepts
Exceeds (21-25)
Both the verbal presentation and visual indicate that the presenter fully comprehends the concepts and purpose of this project. Presenter clearly explained the recommendation including risk-benefit analysis. Explained at least 2 methods of cleaning wastewater and related understanding of methods to recommendation presented.
Proficient (16-20)
Both the verbal presentation and visual indicate that the presenter is adequately familiar with the concepts and purpose of the project.Presenter explained the recommendation including risk-benefit analysis. Explained 2 methods of cleaning wastewater and related understanding of methods to recommendation presented.
Below (11-15)
Both the verbal presentation and visual lacks indication that the presenter understands the concepts and purpose of this project. Presenter gave a recommendation without a risk-benefit analysis. Explained 2 methods of cleaning wastewater.
Unsatisfactory (0-10)
Both the verbal presentation and visual indicate no understanding of the concepts and purpose of the project. Presenter gave a recommendation without a risk-benefit analysis. Explained 2 methods of cleaning wastewater. Treatment of wastewater was described in little or no detail.
Presentation
Exceeds (21-25)
The student speaks clearly and puts their information with complete understanding of their information.It is evident that the student has prepared what will be said.
Student uses good eye contact, audience appropriate language, and is formally dressed for presentation.
Proficient (16-20)
The student speaks clearly presents a good amount of the information expected. Student uses little eye contact, audience appropriate language, and is neatly dressed for presentation.
Below (11-15)
There are several confusing moments and the information presented is not completely shared during the presentation. The student has not practiced what is to be said. Student uses little or no eye-contact, language choice is not appropriate for audience, and no visible attention to dress for presentation.
Unsatisfactory (0-10)
No preparation was done for the presentation and the information that is presented lacks many elements of what is expected. Student does not make eye contact, voice and language is mumbled or not audience appropriate, and no attention to dress for presentation.
Subjects:
Geography
Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Geography rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.