iRubric: ANATOMY DISSECTION rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ANATOMY DISSECTION ANATOMY DISSECTION Earthworm Rubric Code: C53C98 By iileana Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Biology Type: Exam Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

DISSECTION EXAM Enter rubric description
	FALLS FAR BELOW 1 pts	APPROACHES 2 pts	MEETS 3 pts	EXCEEDS 4 pts
Ability to respond to questions 40 pts 10 pts Answer questions directly and completly? Able to infer answers based on prior knowledge?	FALLS FAR BELOW Answered 1-4 questions correctly	APPROACHES Answered 5-8 questions correctly	MEETS Answered all questions correctly some with promting	EXCEEDS Answered all questions correctly with out prompting and without hesitation
Accuracy ? Completeness 30 pts 10 pts Dissection complete	FALLS FAR BELOW Dissection incomplete with or without additional tissue, and / or 6 or more labels missing	APPROACHES Dissection incomplete with or without additional tissue, and / or 3-5 or more labels missing	MEETS Dissection complete with or without additional tissue, and / or 2 or more labels missing	EXCEEDS Dissection complete with no additional tissue, and no missing labels. All items are identified
Follow Directions 5 pts 10 pts Were directions followed according to the order of instruction as given	FALLS FAR BELOW Used no direction, not focused. Teacher re-directed more than 3 times	APPROACHES Followed printed guide, 2 or more times got off track, teacher re-directed	MEETS Followed printed guide, once got off track during dissection, self re-directed	EXCEEDS Followed printed guide, and did not get ahead of the directions.
Follow lab safety procedures 5 pts 10 pts Using lab safety equipment	FALLS FAR BELOW No use of safety procedures and or equipment	APPROACHES Safety procedure and equipment used, but with 2-4 infractions	MEETS Safety procedure and equipment used, but with one infractions	EXCEEDS Always used safety procedures and equipment
Working cooperatively 5 pts 10 pts Working cooperatively with desgignated group	FALLS FAR BELOW Group did not work together	APPROACHES Group at times worked togeter (in sub groups)	MEETS Group worked well forl for most of the project	EXCEEDS Group worked extermly well together, peer ineraction, mentoring
Working Productively 5 pts 10 pts Working productively to complete task	FALLS FAR BELOW Did'nt get much done. Wasted most of the time. Off task for most of the time.	APPROACHES Got some of the task done in sub group, others stayed off task.	MEETS Completed the task, left little time for clean-up	EXCEEDS Extermly efficient, task completed and clean up complete