Skip to main content
iRubric: Project 3 - Finished Educational Website rubric

iRubric: Project 3 - Finished Educational Website rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Project 3 - Finished Educational Website 
Project 2 - Website Creation in Google Sites
This is a W204 rubric for Project 3 taught at IUPUC during the Summer of 2010
Rubric Code: C4XB63
By taroman
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Project 3
Finished educational website design for W204 created in Google Sites
  Poor

Inadequate work. Minimum expectations not met.

2 pts

Fair

Adequate work, but effort does not fulfill required expectations.

3 pts

Good

Strong work overall. Work generally meets expectations.

4 pts

Excellent

Exemplary work overall. Work above and beyond expectations.

5 pts

Page development/Content

Strong content development present on 20+ pages.
Poor

Content developed to a minimal degree. Fewer than 20 pages are developed and some pages lack appropriate content. The information that you provide may not reflect relevant and current information that hit target audiences. Your writing is incomplete and lacks clarity.
Fair

Content developed to a fair degree. Though 20 pages developed, many show minimal development. The information that you provide shows integration of relevant and current information that hit target audiences. Your writing needs to be more complete and clear.
Good

Content developed to a strong degree. Twenty pages developed. The information that you provide shows integration of relevant and current information that hit target audiences. Your writing is complete and clear.
Excellent

Content developed to the highest degree. Over 20 pages developed. The information that you provide shows integration of relevant and current information that hit target audiences. Your writing is well-organized, complete, clear, and appealing.
Embedded Objects & Form

Integration of at least two embedded objects (in lieu of JavaScript and Java Applets) and a Google Form found on at least three different pages.
Poor

Minimum of two embedded objects (in lieu of JavaScript and Java Applets) and/or a Google Form found. Not all items are present or function properly. Items that are present could be more appropriate or thoughtful.
Fair

Application of two embedded objects (in lieu of JavaScript and Java Applets) and a Google Form found on at least three different pages. Though present functioning properly, more than one item could be more appropriate or thoughtful.
Good

Application of two embedded objects (in lieu of JavaScript and Java Applets) and a Google Form found on at least three different pages. Though present functioning properly, at least one item could be more appropriate or thoughtful.
Excellent

Application of two embedded objects (in lieu of JavaScript and Java Applets) and a Google Form found on at least three different pages. Each item is appropriate, thoughtful, and functioning properly. High effort in the selection of your embedded objects and development of your form noted.
Authorship/copyright

Attention given to issues related to Copyright and Fair Use.
Poor

No images in your website are either credited to you or to a copyright free source. If external source used, you did not credit the original image. Copyright information (e.g. Copyright Tiffany Roman 2010) found on few pages. When referencing other schools, you ignore their publishing policies and adhere to safety/liability guidelines.
Fair

Some images (min. 1) in your website are either credited to you or to a copyright free source. If external source used, you may not have credited the original image. Copyright information (e.g. Copyright Tiffany Roman 2010) found on some of your pages. When referencing other schools, you rarely follow their publishing policies and adhere to safety/liability guidelines.
Good

All images (min. 2) in your website are either credited to you or to a copyright free source. If external source used, credit links to original image. Copyright information (e.g. Copyright Tiffany Roman 2010) found on most of your pages. When referencing other schools, you do not necessarily follow their publishing policies and adhere to safety/liability guidelines.
Excellent

All images (min. 2) in your website are either credited to you or to a copyright free source. If external source used, credit links to original image. Copyright information (e.g. Copyright Tiffany Roman 2010) found on all of your pages. When referencing other schools, you follow their publishing policies and adhere to safety/liability guidelines.
Functionality/Accessibility

Navigation, embedded objects, links, and all Google Docs function properly.
Poor

All internal pages are linked together through a navigational bar, but organization needs great improvement. Few internal and external links work properly. Few external links open in a new window. Few embedded objects function properly. Few Google docs are published.
Fair

All internal pages are linked together through a navigational bar, but organization can be improved. Not all links to internal and external pages work properly and not all external links open in a new window. Not all embedded objects function properly. Not all Google docs are published.
Good

All internal pages are linked together through a navigational bar in a somewhat organized fashion. Though links to both internal and external pages work properly, not all external links open in a new window. All embedded objects function properly. All Google docs are published.
Excellent

All internal pages are linked together through a navigational bar in an organized fashion. Links to both internal and external pages work properly, and external links open in a new window. All embedded object function properly. All Google docs are published. Image sizes do not exceed 35K.
Spelling/Grammar/Capitalization

Evidence of formal writing present. Attention given to spelling, capitalization, and grammar.
Poor

More attention needs to be given to formal writing. More than 10 errors found on your website. Proper nouns may not be capitalized appropriately (e.g. Google, Internet, SMART Boards, etc.)
Fair

More attention needs to be given to formal writing. Seven to nine errors found on your website. Proper nouns may not be capitalized appropriately (e.g. Google, Internet, SMART Boards, etc.)
Good

More attention needs to be given to formal writing. Three to six errors found on your website. Proper nouns may not be capitalized appropriately (e.g. Google, Internet, SMART Boards, etc.)
Excellent

Evidence of formal writing (including attention to grammar and spelling) is present. Less than two total errors found on your website. Proper nouns capitalized appropriately (e.g. Google, Internet, SMART Boards, etc.)
Layout/Format/Text

Page consistency, type choice/size/alignment, paragraph length, image flow, readability/attractiveness.
Poor

Pages lack consistency. Type size/color/placement for titles and body text is not consistent on five or more pages. Text alignment varies from page to page. Paragraphs may not be short or readable. Bullets and numbered lists reflect alignment issues. Image placement lacks thought and images do not flow together well. The overall website lacks readability and attractiveness.
Fair

Pages have an inconsistent look. Type size/color/placement for titles and body text is not consistent on 3-4 pages. Text is primarily aligned to the left (not centered). Paragraphs may not be short or readable. Bullets and numbered lists reflect alignment issues. Image placement is mostly appropriate, but the images do not flow together well. The overall website is somewhat readable and attractive.
Good

Pages have a somewhat consistent look. Type size/color/placement for titles and body text are consistent, except for 1-2 pages. Text is primarily aligned to the left (not centered). Paragraphs are short and readable. Bullets and numbered lists may have alignment issues. Image placement is mostly appropriate and images flow together. The overall website is readable and attractive.
Excellent

Pages have a consistent look. Type size/color/placement for titles and body text should be consistent on all pages. Text is aligned to the left (not centered). Paragraphs are short and readable. Bullets and numbered lists flow well. Image placement is appropriate and images flow well together. The overall website is extremely readable and very attractive.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60