Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Program Evaluation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Program Evaluation Rubric
Peer Review Grading Rubric
Use to assess students' use of a program evaluation tool for a youth-serving organization
Rubric Code:
C4A3AA
By
cljking
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Program evaluation assessment
Poor
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
content and development
Poor
Incomplete content, unclear and/or incoherent.
Fair
Unfocused,content not comprehensive enough or persuasive, does not provide enough depth.
Major points are considered but not supported and does not address what is to be evaluated. Lacks clarity of purpose.
Good
Focused content. Comprehensive with examples and support for conclusions.,,major points are stated clearly and are well supported. content and purpose of evaluation are clear.
organization & structure
Poor
Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. Introduction or conclusion is missing. Findings are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Fair
Uneasy structure.
introduction is lacking major points. transitions need improving. Conclusion does not flow from the findings presented.
Good
Structure of paper is clear and easy to follow. Uses transitional words to move the reading forward.
Major points are lcear and backed up with examples.
Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain their flow of thought throughtout the paper. Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
format
Poor
Lacks elements of correct formatting and/or skips some sections or steps of tool. Inadequate/excessivein length.
Fair
Follows most guidelines. Too many details obscure main pioints or too few support conclusions.
Good
Paper follows designated guidelines. Appropriate details for the purpose of the evaluation.
grammar, punctuation & spelling
Poor
Contains numerous grammatical punctuation and spelling errors. Uses jargon or conversational tone.
Fair
Contains a few grammatical errors, punctuation and spelling errors, uses some jargon or conversational tone.
Good
Rules of grammar, usuage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is clear, succinct, concise and precise, sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Keywords:
program evaluation assessment
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Test Preparation
Types:
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.