Skip to main content

iRubric: Case Study Wiki - Part I rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Case Study Wiki - Part I Wiki Rubric for a collaborative project This is a rubric for the initial response to a case study. Rubric Code: C44544 By ddesawal Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: (Other) Grade Levels: Graduate

Case Study - Part I
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Wiki Content
Content	Poor Minimal or missing content, 3 or more factual errors. No details or examples.	Fair Demonstrates essentialknowledge however contains 1 -2 factual errors. Very few details or examples.	Good Demonstrates essential knowledge with no factual errors. Some details and examples.	Excellent Demonstrates in-depth knowledge. Many details and examples.
Organization	Poor Content has no logical organization.	Fair Content has some logical organization.	Good Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize topics.	Excellent Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize topis and group related material.
Analysis of the Problem	Poor No information related to the central issues in the case or the decisions that need to be made are presented. The introduction does not show an understanding of the case.	Fair Little information is provided related to the issues in the case or the decisions that need to be made.	Good The general information relatd to the central issues in the case are included. The decision(s) that need to be made are not clear. Little direction is given to the reader to understand the organization of how the response will be presented.	Excellent Introduction to the case study clearly articulates the central issues in the case. The decision(s) that need to made are clearly stated. The oganization of how the response will be presented is also included.
Outlines Available Options	Poor Only one idea was presented. No additional options were presented in response to the case.	Fair Only two options were preseted and demonstrated minor evidence of original thinking.	Good Shows evidence of some critical thought. At least three plausible options were presented and each option included an anylsis of the positive and negative aspects. Little reference was provided related to the additional data needed to make a decision.	Excellent Many original ideas linked to topic and material. More than three plausible options were presented and each option clearly outlined the postiive and negative aspects. A discussion regarding what additional data would be needed for the decision process was also included.
Final Response	Poor It isn't clear what the final response. No additional information on how the final decision will be operationalized into practice is presented.	Fair The final response is not clear and includes elements of multiple options. How the decision was made to go with this course of action is not clear. The plan for implementation is not clear.	Good The final response is one of the options provided. Little additional information is provided to show how this response will be implemented.	Excellent The final response is clear and one of the options provided. A clear explanation of how the response will be put into action is provided and a rational for your final decision is included.
Citation: APA	Poor Copies material without citing sources.	Fair Does not give credit to most sources. Uses improper format for citing sources.	Good Gives credit to most sources. Uses proper format for citing format with minor errors.	Excellent Gives credit to all sources. Uses proper format for citing sources.
Collaboration
Contribution	Poor Did not contribute the development of the response for the case. No contribution or minimal input to development of the wiki.	Fair Minimal participation was represented toward the response provided. Showed little contribution toward the final response. Moderate input to development of wiki.	Good Basic development of ideas on the issue. Adequate input to development of wiki.	Excellent Contributed a great deal of information and blended their own ideas on topic with others to come up with a response. Constant input to development of wiki.
Authorship	Poor Does not create any content or edit anyone else's responses within the case.	Fair Contributes to the creation of one part of the content. Only submits one change/suggestion to other aspects within the case response.	Good Contributes to the creation of two aspects of the content. Makes changes/suggestions to two to three other aspects within the case response.	Excellent Contributes to the creation of more than two aspects of the content. Makes changes/suggestions to more than three other aspects within the case response.

Keywords:

wiki

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Computers rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202