iRubric: African Trade Market Skit rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
African Trade Market Skit Skit/Play Rubric Code: C36835 By natsheh Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Skit/Play
	Excellent 30 pts	Good 20 pts	Fair 15 pts	Poor 0 pts
Performance	Excellent Performed with excitement and enthusiasm. All characters' lines are understood and heard.	Good Performed with some enthusiasm. Most characters' lines are understood and heard.	Fair Performance lacks enthusiasm. Some characters' lines are understood and heard others are unclear.	Poor Performance is poor. Characters' lines are unclear and cannot be heard.
Information	Excellent All information used is accurate and appropriate to topic. Ten questions are all answered and additional information is included.	Good Most information used is accurate and appropriate to topic. Most of the ten questions are answered with a brief response.	Fair Some information used is accurate and appropriate to topic. Some information is off topic or inaccurate. Some of the ten questions are answered and not elaborated on.	Poor Information used is not accurate and appropriate to topic. Ten questions are not answered.
Creativity	Excellent High level of creativity shown with choice of theme and character roles. Main story line is very clear and consistent throughout.	Good Creativity shown with choice of theme and character roles. Main story line is clear and consistent throughout most of performance.	Fair Some creativity shown but choice of theme and characters' roles are lacking. Main story line is unclear and/or is not consistent throughout performance.	Poor Creativity not shown. No clear theme, character roles, and/or main story is present.
Group Effort	Excellent Student was a great worker and contributed widely to the creation of the skit. Was a key player in the performance.	Good Student created some input towards this skit but could of contributed more. Was a key player but did not stand out in the performance.	Fair Student created some input towards this skit but did not contribute much. Was a player that did not stand out in the performance.	Poor Student contributed little to nothing in the creation of the skit. Did not have a part in the performance.