iRubric: Website Critique Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Website Critique Rubric Website Evaluation Rubric: Purdue OWL Based on your lecture Evaluating Websites: Developing a new Persceptive, use the following rubric to critique 3 sites. Please fill in the comments section for each of the criteria. Rubric Code: C352A5 By hdavenport Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Website Critique
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	Comments 0 pts
Content	Poor The content does is not relevant to the intended audience. Very little information is accurate and factual. It is not up to date (has not been updated for more than 3 years).	Fair The content is somewhat relevant but a bit confusing. Some of the information is accurate, not up to date (has been updated within the past 2-3 years), and factual. There may be a few errors.	Good Most of the information is accurate and up to date (has been updated within the past year). There may be a couple of errors and extraneous information contained that are not necessary.	Excellent All of the information is accurate and timely. The content is perfectly matched to the intended audience.	Comments
Organization	Poor Very little information is presented in a clear, concise manner.	Fair Some of the information is presented in a clear, concise manner.	Good Most of the information is presented in a clear, concise manner.	Excellent All of the information is presented in a clear, concise manner, and can be easily navigated.	Comments
Navigation	Poor The user is not able to navigate the site in an easy manner. Links and menu options are not displayed in a consistent manner.	Fair The user is able to navigate the site on the homepage. Links and menu options are not displayed in a consistent manner on subsequent pages.	Good The user is able to navigate the site in a somewhat easy manner. Links and menu options are displayed in an easy to follow manner but shift slightly from page to page.	Excellent The user is able to navigate the site in an easy manner. Links and menu options are displayed in an easy to follow manner from page to page.	Comments
Aesthetics	Poor All of the following: mismatched graphics, typeface(s) and clashing/low contrast colors, hinder readability and confuse the message of the site.	Fair Two of the following: mismatched graphics, typeface(s) and clashing/low contrast colors, hinder readability and confuse the message of the site.	Good One of the following: mismatched graphics, typeface(s) or clashing/low contrast colors, hinder readability and confuse the message of the site.	Excellent Graphics, typeface, and colors complement and enhance the message of the site.	Comments
Total	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent	Comments