Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Experiment/Lab Design for Fluids - Science Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Experiment/Lab Design for Fluids - Science Rubric
Experiment Design Rubric
Your grade is based on your ability to design a lab report. NOTE: Procedures should include any safety precautions needed for the lab, and you need to state the independent and dependent variables in your hypothesis. You will not be performing the lab, instead, your classmates will have an opportunity to do your lab. You are responsible for providing the necessary materials so that your peers will be able perform the experiment.
Rubric Code:
C2W3WCW
By
lucianna
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Lab report
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Emerging
2 pts
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory
1 pts
background information
5 pts
Excellent
Clear detailed background information. All information related to the experiment and investigation is covered in background. information is not plagiarized and the source is cited
Good
background is good but lacks complete explanation. sources are cited
Emerging
Incomplete. lacks detail and descriptions are incoherent or incomplete. sources are not documented and or plagiarized
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory
This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Hypothesis
2 pts
(includes independent and dependent variables)
Excellent
Is stated as an if...then ... because ... statement or strong hypothesis.
Is directly related to the problem with important supporting details about what may be causing the problem or what could be done to solve it.
Good
Is stated in if...then... because ... format or strong hypothesis but needs to relate to the problem more directly and identify a realistic "because" statement.
Emerging
Needs to be stated as if...then... because ... statement or strong hypothesis. Needs to relate to the problem more directly.
Needs supporting detail (a better because).
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory
This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Materials list
5 pts
Excellent
List is complete for an accurate replication of the experiment. List includes quantitative measurements using the metric system.
Good
List is complete but quantities not always there or missing completely.
Emerging
Listed but not complete. Quantities missing or are rarely there or the metric system isn't used for data collection.
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory
This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Procedures
10 pts
Excellent
Written as though giving directions. Written in complete sentences.
Are complete with no steps missing. A model or diagram is used as needed.
Good
Logical sequence but missing steps. Some incomplete sentences. The model or diagram that is used is incomplete or distracting.
Emerging
Needs more steps for the lab to be reliable.<BR>
Needs complete sentences. Model isn't used when it would have been an obvious addition.
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory
This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Tables, Graphs, & Data Analysis
8 pts
Excellent
Accurate observation table, data table,
and graph are present. The data graph is properly set up and is supported by the data in the chart. Includes relevant qualitative data and other observations.
Good
Observation table or data table needs to be properly labeled to make sense of the data and /or graph needs to be properly labeled to make better sense of the results.
Emerging
Data missing from the observation table, data table, and or graph.
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory
This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Analysis and conclusion
5 pts
Excellent
Conclusion sums up the data and analyzes how the test procedures could have been improved and how the data relates to the hypothesis.
Good
Some questions about the data are not discussed or have incomplete answers conclusions.
Emerging
Hypothesis needs to be
restated and data used to describe how it is or is not supported needs more analysis.
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory
This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Keywords:
Observation, Research, Problem, Hypothesis, Procedure, independent variable, dependent variable, constants, control, data table, graph, results statement, conclusion
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.