Skip to main content
iRubric: TED Talk Evaluation and Reflection rubric

iRubric: TED Talk Evaluation and Reflection rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
TED Talk Evaluation and Reflection 
TED Talk Evaluation and Reflection
Provide a summary and analysis of the TED talk. Write a personal response and reflection of the TED talk, including if applicable comparison with topics discussed in class. Reflection should be approximately 1 page and include a summary that approximately 2 paragraphs long.
Rubric Code: C249A4C
By jbohall
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Reflection  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Qualities and Criteria
  Unacceptable

0 pts

Poor

This category will reflect that the student did not put forth effort or understanding of the assignment. Paper does not follow guidelines. No assistance was sought for problems. Potentially failing paper.

1 pts

Fair

A paper of fair quality will show some effort but lack analysis or structure qualities as presented in the guidelines.

2 pts

Good

A good paper has the general structure and mechanics expressed in the guidelines with a few areas of weakness. A good paper could be made excellent with help from learning resources.

2.5 pts

Excellent

An excellent paper follow all guidelines clearly and shows significant thought and effort. If the student struggled with an area, assistance with improvement was found. Mechanics are near perfect.

3 pts

Format of Paper

Unacceptable

-No apparent format.
-Less than one page submission
-Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Poor

- Does not follow an organized outline of ideas
- Length is too short or too long
-Identified font is not used
-Margins are not set
Fair

-Some outline attempted in organization of ideas
-Unclear transitions to new ideas
-Length is not met or font is not appropriate
Good

-Outline is clear in presentation of ideas
-Appropriate length of paper
-Correct font is used
Excellent

-Very clear and organized ideas
-Strong presentation of paper outline
-Approximately 1 pages in length
-Correct font
Summary and Analysis of Film

Unacceptable

-Quotes not identified and
unacceptable.
-No formal descriptions
-Illustrations not included
-Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Poor

-Does not give reader a summary of the TED talk
-Key points are not addressed
-Provides no critical thinking and only a summary of what occurred
-Gives no relation to the course work or terminology
-No focus on what caught the writer's attention
Fair

-Gives a general idea of the TED talk but lacks in clarity of the plot and characters
-Uses some basic course terminology but limited critical thinking about the talk's purpose, theme, actions, and/or conflict presented
Good

-Gives detailed explanation of the film's main plot and characters extending beyond two paragraphs-Provides new perspective and relation to the issues addressed in the course
-Uses terminology learned from the course in appropriate ways
Excellent

-Gives reader a clear understanding of the TED talk and the key points discussed but is no more than two paragraphs
-Provides evidence of critical thinking
-Uses terminology learned from the course in appropriate ways
Personal Reflection

Unacceptable

-Nothing submitted
-No reflection and/or reaction
-Not the assigned task, off task
Poor

-Very vague and no personal reaction included
-Inappropriate use of reflection taking up majority of the paper
-Disjointed
Fair

-Some reflection but lacks in ability to relate to what was learned through the TED talk
Good

-Good overall reaction is presented
-Reflection of what was personally learned from the TED talk and some relation to the course.
Excellent

-Reflection flows well and integrates learning from the coursework as well as the TED talk
-Expression of personal reaction to the TED talk and the course (if applicable)
Enter Title
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

0.5 pts

Excellent

1 pts

N/A

0 pts

N/A

0 pts

Mechanics

Poor

-Many spelling errors that detract from meaning
-Several grammatical errors
-Punctuation errors
Fair

-Generally appropriate usage of grammar and punctuation
-Evidence of spell check used
Excellent

-Virtually free of grammar and spelling errors
-Limited punctuation errors
N/A
N/A






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232