Skip to main content
iRubric: Final Project: Science behind culture rubric

iRubric: Final Project: Science behind culture rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Project: Science behind culture 
Use movie making techniques to create a movie about a cultural topic and the science behind it. Movie project should include a script, narrations, b-roll, interviews, and full credits.
Rubric Code: C23C57
By joeferal
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

10 pts

Good

20 pts

Audio

Poor

No real thought or effort given to audio or use of b-roll and stills.
Fair

Audio is muddled or distracting. B-roll ineffective. Volume levels are consistant.
Good

Audio is easy to understand: music matches mood and words are easily understood.
B-roll and stills effectively inhance voice overs. Volume level does not vary from vo to vo.
Effects

Poor

Film has no real consideration or use of effects that could be applied to enhance the movie or documentary.
Fair

Film has limited editing to include appropriate effects.
Good

Film is edited to use appropriate effects on stills, b-roll and audio. Attribution of sources are given on screen when appropriate and in the credits.
Transitions

Poor

Transitions limited or not used to help the the film's story.
Fair

Transitions used, but do not effectly take the viewer on the film's journey.
Good

Transitions (in reporting and visuals) effectively take the viewer from one part (act) of the film to another.
Cultural aspect

Poor

Content lacks serious thought about the subject. Lacks research and accuracy.
Fair

Content lacks depth of research, but captures the essence of the topic. Writing was weak and/or needed edititing.
Good

Content is fair, balanced, and accurate. Source identified. Interviews and research are used to obtain information. Clear, precise language is used. Images match the content. Background info included.
Scientific Aspect I

Poor

Content lacks serious thought about the subject. Lacks research and accuracy. If this class is subsituted for science credit, film does not cover enough of the assigned astronomy or geology standards.
Fair

Content lackes depth of research, but captures the essence of the topic. Writing was weak and/or needed edititing.
Good

Content is fair, balanced, accurate and uses interviews and research to obtain information. Clear, precise language is used. Difficult science terms are defined. Images accurately portray science aspect of cultural story. Film must cover required standards for astronomy or geology.
Scientific Aspect II

Poor

Content lacks serious thought about the subject. Lacks research and accuracy. If this class is subsituted for science credit, film does not cover enough of the assigned astronomy or geology standards.
Fair

Content lackes depth of research, but captures the essence of the topic. Writing was weak and/or needed edititing.
Good

Content is fair, balanced, accurate and uses interviews and research to obtain information. Clear, precise language is used. Difficult science terms are defined. Images accurately portray science aspect of cultural story. Film must cover required standards for astronomy or geology.
Scientific Aspect III

Poor

Content lacks serious thought about the subject. Lacks research and accuracy. If this class is subsituted for science credit, film does not cover enough of the assigned astronomy or geology standards.
Fair

Content lackes depth of research, but captures the essence of the topic. Writing was weak and/or needed edititing.
Good

Content is fair, balanced, accurate and uses interviews and research to obtain information. Clear, precise language is used. Difficult science terms are defined. Images accurately portray science aspect of cultural story. Film must cover required standards for astronomy or geology.
Conclusion and implications

Poor

How science impacts culture is not clear and does not provides a logical glimpse into the future of the scientific and cultural information.
Fair

How science impacts cultural topic is vague and provides a limited glimpse into the future of the scientific and cultural information.
Good

How science impacts cultural aspect of the topic is clear and provides a logical discussion about the future of the reported scientific and cultural information.
Creativity

Poor

Movie is not creative or engaging.
Fair

Movie shows some creative effort, but does not engage the audience when possible.
Good

Movie is put together in a thoughtful and creative way: to a certain extent it is engaging, without distracting from the content.
Work Ethic

Poor

Student work less than 30 percent of the available class time.
Fair

Student worked approxiamately 50 to 70 percent of the available class time.
Good

Student worked 90 to 100 percent of the available class.



Keywords:
  • Movie Making, science

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232