Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Final Project: Science behind culture rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Final Project: Science behind culture
Use movie making techniques to create a movie about a cultural topic and the science behind it. Movie project should include a script, narrations, b-roll, interviews, and full credits.
Rubric Code:
C23C57
By
joeferal
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Poor
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Good
20 pts
Audio
Poor
No real thought or effort given to audio or use of b-roll and stills.
Fair
Audio is muddled or distracting. B-roll ineffective. Volume levels are consistant.
Good
Audio is easy to understand: music matches mood and words are easily understood.
B-roll and stills effectively inhance voice overs. Volume level does not vary from vo to vo.
Effects
Poor
Film has no real consideration or use of effects that could be applied to enhance the movie or documentary.
Fair
Film has limited editing to include appropriate effects.
Good
Film is edited to use appropriate effects on stills, b-roll and audio. Attribution of sources are given on screen when appropriate and in the credits.
Transitions
Poor
Transitions limited or not used to help the the film's story.
Fair
Transitions used, but do not effectly take the viewer on the film's journey.
Good
Transitions (in reporting and visuals) effectively take the viewer from one part (act) of the film to another.
Cultural aspect
Poor
Content lacks serious thought about the subject. Lacks research and accuracy.
Fair
Content lacks depth of research, but captures the essence of the topic. Writing was weak and/or needed edititing.
Good
Content is fair, balanced, and accurate. Source identified. Interviews and research are used to obtain information. Clear, precise language is used. Images match the content. Background info included.
Scientific Aspect I
Poor
Content lacks serious thought about the subject. Lacks research and accuracy. If this class is subsituted for science credit, film does not cover enough of the assigned astronomy or geology standards.
Fair
Content lackes depth of research, but captures the essence of the topic. Writing was weak and/or needed edititing.
Good
Content is fair, balanced, accurate and uses interviews and research to obtain information. Clear, precise language is used. Difficult science terms are defined. Images accurately portray science aspect of cultural story. Film must cover required standards for astronomy or geology.
Scientific Aspect II
Poor
Content lacks serious thought about the subject. Lacks research and accuracy. If this class is subsituted for science credit, film does not cover enough of the assigned astronomy or geology standards.
Fair
Content lackes depth of research, but captures the essence of the topic. Writing was weak and/or needed edititing.
Good
Content is fair, balanced, accurate and uses interviews and research to obtain information. Clear, precise language is used. Difficult science terms are defined. Images accurately portray science aspect of cultural story. Film must cover required standards for astronomy or geology.
Scientific Aspect III
Poor
Content lacks serious thought about the subject. Lacks research and accuracy. If this class is subsituted for science credit, film does not cover enough of the assigned astronomy or geology standards.
Fair
Content lackes depth of research, but captures the essence of the topic. Writing was weak and/or needed edititing.
Good
Content is fair, balanced, accurate and uses interviews and research to obtain information. Clear, precise language is used. Difficult science terms are defined. Images accurately portray science aspect of cultural story. Film must cover required standards for astronomy or geology.
Conclusion and implications
Poor
How science impacts culture is not clear and does not provides a logical glimpse into the future of the scientific and cultural information.
Fair
How science impacts cultural topic is vague and provides a limited glimpse into the future of the scientific and cultural information.
Good
How science impacts cultural aspect of the topic is clear and provides a logical discussion about the future of the reported scientific and cultural information.
Creativity
Poor
Movie is not creative or engaging.
Fair
Movie shows some creative effort, but does not engage the audience when possible.
Good
Movie is put together in a thoughtful and creative way: to a certain extent it is engaging, without distracting from the content.
Work Ethic
Poor
Student work less than 30 percent of the available class time.
Fair
Student worked approxiamately 50 to 70 percent of the available class time.
Good
Student worked 90 to 100 percent of the available class.
Keywords:
Movie Making, science
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.