Skip to main content

iRubric: Luke-Acts Theme Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Luke-Acts Theme Presentation Theological theme presentation from Col or Eph Each learning team prepares a class presentation. Themes must be picked from the syllabus. The presentation may take on a variety of forms but must come with a prepared student resource handout. Rubric Code: BXW6294 By RenateHood Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Humanities Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Luke-Acts Theme Presentation
	Exceeds 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts
Quality of project 25 %	Exceeds Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. Project fully connected the theme to Luke-Acts; it showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.	Good Project was organized. Information presented was clear and interesting. Project connected the theme to Luke-Acts; it showed critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.	Fair Project was fairly organized. Information presented fairly clear. Project fairly connected the theme to Luke-Acts; it showed a fair degree of critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.	Poor Project was poorly organized; and/or information was presented was unclear at times; and/or project poorly connected the theme to Luke-Acts; and/or it showed poor thinking and little application of knowledge gathered.	Unacceptable Project was not organized; and/or information presented was unclear; and/or project did not connect the theme to Luke-Acts; and/or it showed no critical thinking or application of knowledge gathered.
Classroom Presentation 25 %	Exceeds Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the professor.	Good Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.	Fair Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were mostly unable to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.	Poor Presentation was somehwat audible, but needs lots of improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project need improvement. Group members were not able to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.	Unacceptable Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the professor.
Preparedness 20 %	Exceeds Students showed that they were completely prepared and that they had rehearsed before the presentation. They demonstrated knowledge of the subject area.	Good Students showed that they were prepared sufficiently and that they had rehearsed before the presentation. They demonstrated sufficient knowledge of the subject area.	Fair Students seemed to be prepared but one person seemed to carry the success of the presentation.	Poor Students seemed to be somewhat prepared but should have rehearsed more as a team.	Unacceptable Students did not seem prepared to present.
Theme correlation to Luke-Acts 15 %	Exceeds The theme was correlated to Luke-Acts in a thorough manner.	Good The theme was correlated to Luke-Acts in multiple ways.	Fair The theme was correlated to Luke-Acts in a limited way.	Poor The theme was correlated poorly to Luke-Acts.	Unacceptable The theme was in no way correlated to Luke-Acts.
Student handout 15 %	Exceeds Group prepared a clear and informative student handout. The handout was submitted on the due date.	Good Group prepared a fairly clear and informative student handout. The handout was submitted on the due date.	Fair The group turned in a student handout on time but the handout lacked in content and organization.	Poor The group had a student handout but turned it in late.	Unacceptable The group did not have a student handout.

Keywords:

Theology presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202