Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Crucible Essay Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Crucible Essay Rubric
Argumentative Essay Rubric
The attached rubric supports Argumentative Essay Writing under the Common Core State Standards.
Rubric Code:
BXB9665
By
tbudday
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Argumentative Essay Rubric
Exemplary
10 pts
Proficient
8 pts
Emerging
6 pts
Not Yet Demonstrated
5 pts
Intro / Thesis
Exemplary
Well-developed introduction engages the reader and creates interest. Contains detailed background information and a clear explanation of the problem. Thesis clearly states a significant and compelling position.
Proficient
Introduction creates interest and contains background information. Thesis clearly states a problem and the writer's position is evident.
Emerging
Introduction adequately explains the background of the problem, but may lack clarity. thesis states a problem, but writer's position may not be evident.
Not Yet Demonstrated
Background details are a random collection of information, are unclear, and may be loosely related to the topic. Thesis / position is vague or not stated.
Argumentative Points
Exemplary
The response provides thorough and convincing support, citing evidence for the thesis statement that includes the effective use of sources, facts, and details. The response includes most of the following:
• Integrated, thorough, and relevant evidence, including precise references to sources
• Effective use of a variety of elaborative techniques (including but not limited to definitions, quotations, and examples), demonstrating an understanding of the topic and text
• Varied sen
Proficient
The response provides adequate support, citing
evidence for the writer’s thesis statement that includes the use of sources, facts, and details. The response includes most of the following:
• Integrated and relevant evidence from sources, though references may be general or imprecise
• Adequate use of some elaborative techniques
• Adequate expression of ideas, employing a mix of
precise and general language
• Some variation in sentence structure
Emerging
The response provides uneven, cursory support/evidence for the writer’s thesis statement that includes partial use of sources, facts, and details. The response may include the following:
• Weakly integrated evidence from sources; erratic
or irrelevant references or citations
• Repetitive or ineffective use of elaborative techniques
• Imprecise or simplistic expression of ideas
• Some use of inappropriate domain-specific vocabulary
Not Yet Demonstrated
The response provides minimal support/evidence for
the writer’s thesis statement, including little use of sources, facts, and details. The response may include the following:
• Minimal, erroneous, or irrelevant evidence or citations from the source material
• Expression of ideas that is vague, unclear, or confusing
• Limited and often inappropriate language or domain specific vocabulary
• Sentences limited to simple constructions
Organization
Exemplary
Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis. Transition are smooth and provide coherence between and among ideas.
Proficient
Logical progression of ideas. Transitions are present throughout essay and provide adequate coherence between and among ideas.
Emerging
Organization is clear. Transitions are present, but may not lend to coherence between and among ideas.
Not Yet Demonstrated
No disceernable organization. Transition are not present.
Style & Conventions
Exemplary
Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent. Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Diction is consistent and words are well-chosen. The tone is highly consistent with writer's position.<BR>
Punctuation, spelling, & capitalization are accurate with few or no errors.
Proficient
Writing is clear and sentences have some varied structure. Diction is appropriate. Tone is generally consistent with writer's position. Punctuation, spelling, & capitalization are generally accurate, with some errors.
Emerging
Writing is clear, but sentences may lack variety. Diction is sometimes inconsistent and/or inappropriate at various points in essay. Tone may be inconsistent with writer's position / thesis. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, & capitalization.
Not Yet Demonstrated
Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. Diction is inappropriate and inconsistent throughout essay. Tone of piece is highly inconsistent with writer's position / thesis. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, & capitalization distract reader.
Sources
Exemplary
Evidence from sources is smoothly and logically integrated into essay and serves to add credibility & insight into writer's position / thesis. All sources are cited accurately and are highly relevant and reliable.
Proficient
Evidence from source(s) is integrated into the text. Most sources are cited accurately and are generally relevant and reliable.
Emerging
Some source material is used and may or may not lend credibility to writer's position / thesis. Several sources may not be cited accurately. Relevance and reliability may be questionable.
Not Yet Demonstrated
Little or no source material is used. Source citations are not evident or may be highly inaccurate. Relevance and/or reliability are strongly in question.
MLA Formatting
Exemplary
First page is correctly formatted/
Sources are cited correctly in the text/
Works Cited Page is correctly formatted
Proficient
First page is mostly formatted correctly
Most sources are cited correctly in the text/
Works Cited Page is mostly formatted
Emerging
First page is partially correctly formatted/
Some sources are cited correctly in the text/
Works Cited Page is somewhat formatted
Not Yet Demonstrated
First page is not correctly formatted/No Sources are cited correctly in the text/
Thee is a Works Cited Page
Keywords:
MLA, Argumentative,
Subjects:
English
Humanities
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.