Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Nutrition 130- Procedures and Surgeries of the GI tract rubric

iRubric: Nutrition 130- Procedures and Surgeries of the GI tract rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Nutrition 130- Procedures and Surgeries of the GI tract Final Nutrition Project Rubric Students will complete a project related to contemporary issues in nutritional practices to include but not limited to nutrition, healthier eating, obesity, food alternatives, nutrition and disease, and other topics approved by the instructor. Suggested format: Written Paper and oral presentation. Objective: To develop life-long understanding and practices resulting in a healthier body. Pick a disease related to the GI tract and how certain surgeries/procedures pertain to this disease. Rubric Code: BX78WC6 By nriga1 Draft Public Rubric Subject: Nursing Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Nutrition Project Rubric
	Excellent 13 pts	Good 11 pts	Fair 8 pts	Poor 6 pts
Topic Choice and Purpose Statement	Excellent Choice of topic reflects high level of personal interest. Student explains reason for topic and format of project. Potential for personal growth is clearly thought out and well explained. No writing errors.	Good Choice of topic reflects some level of personal interest. Student choice for topic or format not clearly explained. Potential for personal growth is somewhat thought out and explained.	Fair Choice of topic does not reflect personal interest. Choice of topic and or format not clearly explained. Little personal investment or potential for personal growth is evident.	Poor Section absent or written with minimal information.
Personal Reflection Summary	Excellent Summary clearly shares student's heart in how project impacted them. Work is an original design	Good Some reflection and deep thought. Some personal growth realized. Work is an original design	Fair Minimal investment of time shown. Little to no personal reflection evident. Work reflects lack of originality; may have used other resources for the design	Poor Lacks personal reflection on project. Design is clearly copied from an undocumented source.
Information Collection and Evaluati	Excellent Student gathered information from a variety of quality electronic and/or print sources. References Cited Document included with the project (APA) 5+ sources	Good Student gathered information from a variety of relevent sources- print and electronic. References Cited Document included with the project (APA) 3-5 sources	Fair Student gathered information from a limited range or sources and displayed minimal effort in selecting quality resources. References Cited Document included with the project (APA) 1-2 sources	Poor Student gathered information that lacked relevance, quality, depth, and balance. References were not documented or were documented incorrectly.
Analysis	Excellent Student carefully analyzed the information collected and drew appropriate and inventive conclusions supported by evidence. Growth in a personal level is evident.	Good Student product shows that a good effort was made in analyzing the information gathered. It is evident the student experienced personal growth.	Fair Student conclusions could be supported by stronger evidence. Level of analysis lacking depth. Limited evidence of new learning or personal growth is apparent.	Poor Student conclusions are a simple re-statement of information. No evidence of personal growth.
Synthesis	Excellent Student developed an appropriate structure for communicating the product. There is a logical and creative organization with smooth transitions where needed. Product is fluid and cohesive.	Good Student logically organized information and made good connections among ideas.	Fair Student effort was inadequate to bring good organization and fluidity to the product.	Poor Product is not logically or effectively structured.
Documentation and Artistic Design	Excellent Student documents all sources, including visuals, sounds, animations, etc. Information is easy to follow Original artistic design	Good Student documents sources correctly including visuals, sounds, animations, etc. Information is easy to follow; some thought put into artistic design Original artistic design	Fair Documentation poorly organized, incorrectly formated. Information that is presented is hard to follow. Some thought put into artistic design	Poor Documentation absent.
Project Presentation	Excellent Student effectively and creatively used appropriate communication tools to convey their conclusions and demonstrated thorough, effective research techniques. Product displays creativity and originality.	Good Student effectively communicates the results of their project to the audience.	Fair Student fails to clearly communicate the purpose and/or information gathered.	Poor Student showed little evidenct of thoughtful research. Product does not effectively communicate information of project topic.
Writing Mechanics	Excellent All written materials are error-free. Correct spelling, punctuation, sentence construction, and grammar.	Good Written materials are mostly error free.	Fair Many errors present. Detracts from fluidity of written information.	Poor No effort is apparent in proof-reading or self-editing. No regard for proper grammar, punctuation, spelling, or good writing mechanics.

Keywords:

Procedures and Surgeries of the GI tract

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Biology rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n232