Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Nutrition 130- Procedures and Surgeries of the GI tract rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Nutrition 130- Procedures and Surgeries of the GI tract
Final Nutrition Project Rubric
Students will complete a project related to contemporary issues in nutritional practices to include but not limited to nutrition, healthier eating, obesity, food alternatives, nutrition and disease, and other topics approved by the instructor. Suggested format: Written Paper and oral presentation. Objective: To develop life-long understanding and practices resulting in a healthier body. Pick a disease related to the GI tract and how certain surgeries/procedures pertain to this disease.
Rubric Code:
BX78WC6
By
nriga1
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Nursing
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Nutrition Project Rubric
Excellent
13 pts
Good
11 pts
Fair
8 pts
Poor
6 pts
Topic Choice and Purpose Statement
Excellent
Choice of topic reflects high level of personal interest. Student explains reason for topic and format of project. Potential for personal growth is clearly thought out and well explained. No writing errors.
Good
Choice of topic reflects some level of personal interest. Student choice for topic or format not clearly explained. Potential for personal growth is somewhat thought out and explained.
Fair
Choice of topic does not reflect personal interest. Choice of topic and or format not clearly explained. Little personal investment or potential for personal growth is evident.
Poor
Section absent or written with minimal information.
Personal Reflection Summary
Excellent
Summary clearly shares student's heart in how project impacted them.
Work is an original design
Good
Some reflection and deep thought. Some personal growth realized.
Work is an original design
Fair
Minimal investment of time shown. Little to no personal reflection evident.
Work reflects lack of originality; may have used other resources for the design
Poor
Lacks personal reflection on project.
Design is clearly copied from an undocumented source.
Information Collection and Evaluati
Excellent
Student gathered information from a variety of quality electronic and/or print sources.
References Cited Document included with the project (APA)
5+ sources
Good
Student gathered information from a variety of relevent sources- print and electronic.
References Cited Document included with the project (APA)
3-5 sources
Fair
Student gathered information from a limited range or sources and displayed minimal effort in selecting quality resources.
References Cited Document included with the project (APA)
1-2 sources
Poor
Student gathered information that lacked relevance, quality, depth, and balance.
References were not documented or were documented incorrectly.
Analysis
Excellent
Student carefully analyzed the information collected and drew appropriate and inventive conclusions supported by evidence.
Growth in a personal level is evident.
Good
Student product shows that a good effort was made in analyzing the information gathered.
It is evident the student experienced personal growth.
Fair
Student conclusions could be supported by stronger evidence.
Level of analysis lacking depth. Limited evidence of new learning or personal growth is apparent.
Poor
Student conclusions are a simple re-statement of information.
No evidence of personal growth.
Synthesis
Excellent
Student developed an appropriate structure for communicating the product.
There is a logical and creative organization with smooth transitions where needed. Product is fluid and cohesive.
Good
Student logically organized information and made good connections among ideas.
Fair
Student effort was inadequate to bring good organization and fluidity to the product.
Poor
Product is not logically or effectively structured.
Documentation and Artistic Design
Excellent
Student documents all sources, including visuals, sounds, animations, etc.
Information is easy to follow
Original artistic design
Good
Student documents sources correctly including visuals, sounds, animations, etc.
Information is easy to follow; some thought put into artistic design
Original artistic design
Fair
Documentation poorly organized, incorrectly formated.
Information that is presented is hard to follow.
Some thought put into artistic design
Poor
Documentation absent.
Project Presentation
Excellent
Student effectively and creatively used appropriate communication tools to convey their conclusions and demonstrated thorough, effective research techniques. Product displays creativity and originality.
Good
Student effectively communicates the results of their project to the audience.
Fair
Student fails to clearly communicate the purpose and/or information gathered.
Poor
Student showed little evidenct of thoughtful research. Product does not effectively communicate information of project topic.
Writing Mechanics
Excellent
All written materials are error-free.
Correct spelling, punctuation, sentence construction, and grammar.
Good
Written materials are mostly error free.
Fair
Many errors present.
Detracts from fluidity of written information.
Poor
No effort is apparent in proof-reading or self-editing.
No regard for proper grammar, punctuation, spelling, or good writing mechanics.
Keywords:
Procedures and Surgeries of the GI tract
Subjects:
Biology
Health
Nursing
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.