Skip to main content
iRubric: Case Study Report rubric

iRubric: Case Study Report rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Case Study Report 
Language Experience Approach
Rubric Code: BX6AC2B
By mwalski
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric LEA Project
  Exemplary

90 pts

Meets Criteria

85 pts

Approaching Criteria

70 pts

Developing Criteria

45 pts

Content/Description

Exemplary

All components of the project are implemented and included in the final written assignment. Details are clearly provided so that there is no question or ambiguity on how the procedure unfolded. The reader can clearly understand the context, the learner, decisions made by the candidate, and analysis of the student's literacy development. Observation notes and artifacts are included.
Meets Criteria

All components of the project are implemented and included in the final written assignment and clearly described so that the reader could reproduce the procedure. The reader can understand the context, the learner, decisions made by the candidate, and analysis of the student's literacy development. Observation notes and artifacts are included.
Approaching Criteria

Most components of the project are implemented and included in the final written assignment and described so that the reader could likely reproduce the procedure. The reader can somewhat understand the context, the learner, decisions made by the candidate, and analysis of the student's literacy development. Partial observation notes and artifacts are included.
Developing Criteria

Some components of the project are implemented and included in the final written assignment. The procedure is described but lacks clarity and details. The reader can not understand the context, the learner, decisions made by the candidate, and analysis of the student's literacy development. Few or no observation notes and artifacts are included.
Organization/Tone

Exemplary

Final paper is logically organized. Organization adds to clarity of procedures. Tone is appropriate for an audience of educators. Academic and professional language is used appropriately.
Meets Criteria

Final paper is logically organized. Organization adds to clarity of procedures. Tone is appropriate for an audience of educators. Academic and professional language is used appropriately.
Approaching Criteria

Final paper is mostly organized. Organization lends some clarity to procedures. Tone is somewhat appropriate for an audience of educators. Academic and professional language is mostly used appropriately. Organization and/or tone interferes somewhat with comprehending the content.
Developing Criteria

Final paper is not organized. Organization detracts from clarity of procedures. Tone is not appropriate for an audience of educators. Academic and professional language is inappropriately used. Organization and/or tone interferes with comprehending the content.
Reflection

Exemplary

Final paper includes a reflection that articulates the candidate's thinking during and after implementing this project. The reflection draws on readings and lectures from the class to ground thoughts in research or recommended practice.
Meets Criteria

Final paper includes a reflection that articulates the candidate's thinking during and after implementing this project. The reflection draws on readings and lectures from the class to ground thoughts in research or recommended practice.
Approaching Criteria

Final paper includes a reflection that weakly articulates the candidate's thinking during and/or after implementing this project. The reflection weakly draws on readings and lectures from the class to ground thoughts in research or recommended practice.
Developing Criteria

Final paper does not include a reflection that articulates the candidate's thinking during and/or after implementing this project. The reflection does not draw on readings and lectures from the class to ground thoughts in research or recommended practice.
Conventions

Exemplary

Paper meets criteria for length in all sections.
Paper has been proofread for grammar, spelling, and conventions. No errors are found.
Meets Criteria

Paper meets criteria for length in all sections.
Paper has been proofread for grammar, spelling, and conventions. Minor errors do not detract from comprehensibility.
Approaching Criteria

Paper meets most criteria for length.
Paper has not been proofread for grammar, spelling, and conventions. Errors somewhat detract from comprehensibility.
Developing Criteria

Paper does not meet criteria for length.

Paper has not been proofread for grammar, spelling, and conventions. Errors greatly detract from comprehensibility.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232