- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: PROJECT RUBRIC

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
PROJECT RUBRIC Rubric Code: BB57X6 By JESSICAFOY Draft Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

PROJECT: Natural Disasters
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
TEAMWORK	Poor * Group members played a passive role in completion of the project. * Group was often off task, did not complete assignments or duties * Group did not progress on project	Fair * Group memebers played an active role in generating new ideas, took initiative in getting tasks organized and completed and sought help when needed. * Group was prepared, managed time well, and worked diligently.	Good * Thoughtfully organized and divided the work, checked on progress, or provided focus and direction for the project. * Actively checked with others to understand how each memeber was progressing and how he or she may be of help.
PROJECT CONTENT	Poor * Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. * More than one requirement was not completely met.	Fair * Includes essential knowledge about topics. * Subject knowledge appears to be good. * All requirements are met.	Good * Covers topics in-depth with details and examples. * Subject knowledge is excellent. * All requirements are met and exceeded.
CRITICAL THINKING	Poor * Reasoning is unclear, illogical or superficial. * Interprets or calculares information inaccurately. * Makes statements with little explanation.	Fair * Reasoning is clear and logical. * Interprets or calculates information accurately. * Supports statements with explanations. * Student can identify relationships between ideas, data sets, and phenomena.	Good * Reasoning is thorough; uses creativity. * Supports statements with evidence. * Student is able to use his/her analysis to present the definitions, law, concepts, theories and principles under study.
PRESENTATION & PERFORMANCE	Poor * Speaker was hard to hear or understand. * Excessive use of verbal fillers. * Little eye contact with audience and poor posture.	Fair * Speaker was easy to hear and understand. * Speaks clearly, correctly and without verbal fillers. * Strong eye contact with entire audience and posture conveyed confidence.	Good * Speaker was enjoyable to hear; used expression and emphasis. * Ideas connected by original transitions, logical thoughout; creative pattern.