Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Personality Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Personality Presentation
CDFS 4790: Content Presentation
Group presentation on Personality Theories
Rubric Code:
B8842W
By
apegg06
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Content Presentation
Poor
3 pts
Adequate
5 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Overall aesthetics
Poor
Background makes the presentation hard to read. Graphics are confusing and not related to words. Too much movement in the slides. Many slides hard to read.
Adequate
There are too few graphic elements. Appropriate background. Some slides are hard to read.
Good
Appealing graphic elements are included appropriately. Slides are readable, but wordy. Annimations are used, but are sometimes distracting.
Excellent
Appealing graphic elements are included appropriately. Slides are easy to read and annimations are used effectively.
Mechanics
Poor
There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is not consistent or clear. Too much information on many slides.
Adequate
There are some (4-5) errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is not consistent on a few slides. Too much information on four or more slides.
Good
There are infrequent (1-2) errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is consistent on all slides. Too much information on two or more slides.
Excellent
There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Bullets are consistent and clear. Information is clear and concise on each slide.
Presentation skills
Poor
Two or more of the presenters didn't know the information and got lost often. Diction and voice level made listening difficult. Presnters read all their notes and fail to make eye contact with audience.
Adequate
One presenter didn't know the information and they got lost often. Diction and voice level made listening difficult for the audience. Presenters mostly read notes and make infrequent eye contact with audience.
Good
All presenters knew the information and only got lost on occassion. Diction and voice level made listening easy for the audience. Presenters mostly maintained eye contact with the audience, and referenced their notes on occasion.
Excellent
All presenters knew the information and progressed smoothly through the presentation. Diction and voice level engaged the audience in the presentation. Presenters maintain eye contact with audience, seldom returneing to their notes.
Expert Connections
Poor
Information presented is entirely inaccruate. No examples are given to help audience members apply terms and concepts.
Adequate
Information presented is somewhat accurate. A few examples are given to help audience members apply terms and concepts.
Good
Information presented is entirely accurate. Presenters offer many examples and often elborate on, extend, and explain information to audience members.
Excellent
Information presented is entirely accurate. Presenters have demonstrated the meaning of material by correctly elaborating, extending and explaining information to audience members.
Analysis
Poor
Personality theory was presented without focus. Demonstrated very little understanding. Failed to present the relation between the topic area and the analysis.
Adequate
Personality theory was presented and analyzed. It demonstrated adequate knowledge about the topic area. Relation between the topic area and analysis was weak.
Good
Personality theory was portrayed and showed good understanding. The relation between the topic area and analysis was clear.
Excellent
Personality theory was correctly portrayed and analyzed and demonstrated clear knowledge and depth of meaning. The relation between the topic area and analysis was clear and strong.
Group Facilitating Skills
Poor
Presenters do not have grasp of information; presenters cannot answer questions about subject matter.
Adequate
Presenters are at ease with expected answers to most questions, but fail to elaborate on question answers.
Good
Presenters are at ease with expected answers to most quetions and ellobrate on most question answers.
Excellent
Presenters demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Presentation Length
Poor
1 pts
Adequate
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Graphic Organizer
Poor
Graphic organizer had a few key principles, and ideas, vocabulary and people. Lacked many details and organization.
Adequate
Graphic organizer had many key principles, some main ideas, some vocabulary, and important people.
Good
Graphic organizer had key principles, main ideas, vocabulary, and important people. Looked good.
Excellent
Graphic organizer was complete with key principles, main ideas, vocabulary, and important people. Comprehensive organized and easy to read.
Subjects:
Math
Psychology
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Math rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.