Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Sparta v. Athens Webquest Schlicksup rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Sparta v. Athens Webquest Schlicksup
Rubric Code:
B85WB6
By
educw200student
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Spartan Newspaper
Poor
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Average
15 pts
Excellent
20 pts
Creativity
Poor
The student used no creativity. There was no formatting in the newspaper.
Fair
The student just summarized the websites and used no creativity in the way they formatted the newspaper or relayed the information.
Average
The student did not just summarize the websites but could have used more creativity with each "story."
Excellent
The student was creative in the way they incorporated the information into the newspaper. They did not just summarize the websites. They used different fonts, layouts, pictures, etc. to make the newspaper unique and interesting.
Visual Appearance
Poor
The newspaper was not formatted in a visually interesting way. Did not have any visually appealing aspects. Did not use any pictures.
Fair
The newspaper was not formatted in a way that was appealing and visually interesting to the readers. Only used 1-2 pictures.
Average
The newspaper was formatted in a way that was appealing and visually interesting. Only used pictures for the main categories discussed.
Excellent
The newspaper was formatted in a way that was appealing and visually interesting. Used at least one picture for each subcategory discussed. The visual aspects enhanced the newspaper and were appropriate for the content.
Content
Poor
The student did not address each category on all 4 websites. The information was copied and pasted and was not relayed in an interesting or informative way.
Fair
The student did not address each category on all 4 websites. The information was not just copy and pasted but was not relayed in an interesting or informative way.
Average
The student addressed each category on all 4 websites. The information could have been relayed in a more interesting and informative way. Although they did not just copy and paste.
Excellent
The student addressed each category on all 4 websites. The information they collected was relayed in an interesting and informative way. Did not just copy and paste.
Athens Newspaper
Poor
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Average
15 pts
Excellent
20 pts
Creativity
Poor
The student used no creativity. There was no formatting in the newspaper.
Fair
The student just summarized the websites and used no creativity in the way they formatted the newspaper or relayed the information.
Average
The student did not just summarize the websites but could have used more creativity with each "story."
Excellent
The student was creative in the way they incorporated the information into the newspaper. They did not just summarize the websites. They used different fonts, layouts, pictures, etc. to make the newspaper unique and interesting.
Visual Appearance
Poor
The newspaper was not formatted in a visually interesting way. Did not have any visually appealing aspects. Did not use any pictures.
Fair
The newspaper was not formatted in a way that was appealing and visually interesting to the readers. Only used 1-2 pictures.
Average
The newspaper was formatted in a way that was appealing and visually interesting. Only used pictures for the main categories discussed.
Excellent
The newspaper was formatted in a way that was appealing and visually interesting. Used at least one picture for each subcategory discussed. The visual aspects enhanced the newspaper and were appropriate for the content.
Content
Poor
The student did not address each category on all 4 websites. The information was copied and pasted and was not relayed in an interesting or informative way.
Fair
The student did not address each category on all 4 websites. The information was not just copy and pasted but was not relayed in an interesting or informative way.
Average
The student addressed each category on all 4 websites. The information could have been relayed in a more interesting and informative way. Although they did not just copy and paste.
Excellent
The student addressed each category on all 4 websites. The information they collected was relayed in an interesting and informative way. Did not just copy and paste.
Subjects:
History
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.