Skip to main content

iRubric: Evaluating a Digital Resource rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Evaluating a Digital Resource Evaluating a Digital Resource to determine the value of a specific digital resource for use in a classroom setting. Rubric Code: B83B66 By lovinasaha Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: K-5

Evaluating a digital resource Mangahigh.com
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	Total (N/A)
Content	Poor The information does not meet the intended outcome Few or no links.	Fair The information meets some of the intended outcomes. Links present, but some no longer work. Site badly organised.	Good The information meets the intended outcomes. Links present and work. Some disorganisation of information.	Excellent The information meets the intended outcomes. Links present and work. Site and information well organised.	Total
Authority and affiliation	Poor No author listed. No contact details provided or provided but no longer current. No supporting institution listed.	Fair No author listed. Contact details or email provided. Supporting institute listed.	Good Author is listed, although credentials not complete. Contact details provided. Supporting institution accessible. Some bias may be present.	Excellent Author is listed. Credentials available and verifiable. Contact details valid. Reputable institution suppported with no evident bias.	Total
Purpose and Objectivity	Poor The purpose of the site is not explained or is unclear. Bias evident. Many advertisements.	Fair Site has multiple purposes, or the purpose does not meet specific requirements of this task. Some bias evident. Some advertisements.	Good Purpose is mostly clear. Most requirements for the task are met. Very few external advertisements. Bias is minimal.	Excellent Purpose is clearly defined. Meets requirements of the specific task. No advertisements or all advertisements to reputable and related information. No bias evident in information or links.	Total
Audience	Poor Site not appropriate for the intended class.	Fair Site is at the wrong level for the intended class, yet some information is useful.	Good The level is appropriate for the intended class and the information is partially useful.	Excellent The level is appropriate for the intended class and the information is useful .	Total
Currency	Poor No date is available for the last revision of the site. The information has not been revised for over 18 months.	Fair There is a date available for the last revision, although it is 12 months old. Information is still useful.	Good The last reveision is 6 months old. Information is current.	Excellent The last reveision is 3 months or less. Informationis current and accurate.	Total
Design	Poor The design of the site is innappropriate for the audience. The site is very slow to load.	Fair The appearance of the site is not engaging for the intended audience. Some areas are slow to load.	Good The appearance is engaging, but is not easy to navigate. Loading time is good.	Excellent The site is engaging to look at. Loading time is quick. Navigation is easy and clear.	Total

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Computers rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178