Complete, concise, and well organized presentation of material. No prompting required to elaborate on material.
5 pts
4.5 pts
Well organized, partial but accurate information. Requires little prompting.
4 pts
3.5 pts
Organization needs work, limited amount of pertinent information provided or information inaccurate. Requires some prompting
3 pts
2.5 pts
Poorly organized, missing and/or inaccurate information. Requires significant prompting / leading for information
2 pts
1.5 pts
Not addressed, grossly incomplete and/or inaccurate. Requires preceptor or other students to provide all information
1 pts
Presentation or paper is within allotted time or length (20 minutes)
Completely follows the accepted oral or written format
Speaks or writes clearly without errors in pronunciation, spelling, and/or grammar
Speaks with confidence, eye contact, and interacts with the audience OR writes with engaging style
Speaks or writes in language appropriate for the target audience
Clear objectives presented and met during presentation
Provides audience with pertinent background information about problem presented(epidemiology, risk factors, etc.)
Complete problem list generated and rationally prioritized; no extraneous information or issues listed
Complete and concise summary of pertinent subjective information.
Complete and concise summary of pertinent objective information.
Thorough assessment of current medical condition(s) & medication therapy for each identified problem. Appropriate therapeutic goals for each identified problem.
Specific, appropriate and justified recommendations (including drug name, strength, route, frequency, and duration of therapy) for each identified problem.
Specific patient education points, monitoring parameters, follow-up plan and (where applicable) referral plan for the identified problem.
Brief summary (overview) of journal article before performing analysis (citation, funding, impact of journal, peer reviewed, hypothesis/null hypothesis, study design, endpoints etc)
Characteristics of study population presented (inclusion,exclusion, ITT), explained potential influence of excluded population on results
Summarizes and critiques interventions and methods (Logical? Sufficient detail? Consistent with current practice? Based on standard methods or published/validated scales/measures?
Summarizes and critiques relevant results and discusses statistical and clinical significance (baseline characteristics? External validity? Patient withdrawal? ITT, per-protocol, or other analysis?)
Stated and assessed if valid based on study objectives and results.
Strengths, limitations, bias presented
Articulates whether statistical significance (or lack thereof) correlates with clinical significance and how results can be applied to practice
Complete recommendation based on literature presented. Non-pharmacologic options also presented along with monitoring parameters for therapy
Able to field any questions pertaining to topic and patient case presented.
(N/A)
Not addressed, grossly incomplete and/or inaccurate. Reuires preceptor or other students to provide all information
0 pts
Follows referencing and citation format all of the time