Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Fifth Grade Character Analysis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Fifth Grade Character Analysis
Character Analysis
Pigwidgeon changed over the course of our story. Thinking about what he learned morally, intellectually, and socially, write a paper that explains how he changed over the course of the story.
Rubric Code:
B74BBX
By
JeanDickerson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Widge Character Analysis
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
indent & write on every other line
Poor
Paragraph(s) are not indented. Work is sloppy and not written on every other line.
Fair
Indention of paragraphs is unclear, but work is written on every other line
Good
Paragraph indentation is clear. Work is neat, in cursive, and written on every other line.
Opening sentence
Poor
There is either no clear opening sentence, or the sentence written is not on topic for the assignment.
Fair
The opening sentence is on topic for the subject's paper, but is vague and undetailed.
Good
The opening sentence is on topic for the subject's paper and includes a specific detail.
Commentary statement sentences
Poor
No clear commentary sentences have been included that show character change over time.
Fair
The student has written one commentary (opinion) statement on a change in Widge over the course of the story, but has not thoroughly explored the topic.
Good
The student has clearly taken a stand with a commentary (opinion) sentence on at least two to three areas of change in Widge over the course of the story.
Concrete detail sentences
Poor
The student has not provided specific examples from the story.
Fair
The student has provided one or two examples from the story the support the commentary sentences, but some commentary statements are unsupported with book evidence.
Good
The student has provided concrete examples from the story that support each commentary sentence.
Closing sentence
Poor
There either is no clear closing sentence or the writer does not draw a conclusion about how Widge changed from the beginning of the book to the end.
Fair
The closing sentence draws a conclusion about how Widge changed from the beginning of the book, but lacks a specific detail.
Good
The closing sentence draws a conclusion about how Widge changed from the beginning of the book to the end using specific detail.
Subjects:
Communication
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.