- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Shakespeare Character Journal rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Shakespeare Character Journal Shakespeare Character Journal Students will receive a character to follow through the play. They will journal from that character's point of view. Each entry should be 3/4 to a page long. Include things like: Why does the character act that way? What is making them do this? What problems are in the foreseeable future? Stay in character and write whatever comes to mind. It must be appropriate. Students will then write a paragraph on how they themselves reacted to what was going on in the play. Things to include: What is going on? Is this difficult to understand? Why are people reacting this way? A character might not be in the scene, this is ok. Just write your reflection paragraph on each scene. There should be at least 5 character entries and 9 reflection entries. Rubric Code: B582XA* By bulldog33 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 6-8

Macbeth 100 %
	Outstanding 20 pts	Proficent 12 pts	Poor 4 pts
Topic 20 %	Outstanding The writing focused on the story and what the character may be thinking or feeling.	Proficent The writing did not seem to focus on the story or what the character might be thinking.	Poor The writing had nothing to do with the story or what happened to the character.
Characterization 20 %	Outstanding The writing in the journal makes it obvious which character was chosen for the assignment.	Proficent The writing might be able to apply to the character but there is nothing shows that the character chosen is obvious.	Poor Could not tell the character's POV that was being written about.
Quotes 20 %	Outstanding The writing in the journal included three or more quotes from the play	Proficent The writing in the journal included less than three quotes from the book	Poor The writing in the journal did not include any quotes from the play.
Conventions 20 %	Outstanding Length was met. (10) Writing had no spelling, grammar, punctuation errors and was neatly done.	Proficent Writing had some spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors or was not neatly done.	Poor Writing had frequent (5 or more) spelling, grammar,puand/or punctuation errors or was not neatly done.
Illustration 20 %	Outstanding There were at least three illustrations which were neatly drawn	Proficent There were three illustrations that were incomplete or seemed to show little effort	Poor There were less than three illustrations