Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Geography Website Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Geography Website Rubric
Rubric Code:
B54A5A
By
MrsFrideres
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Geography
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Point Total
168
Excellent
12-10
(N/A)
Good
9-7
(N/A)
Satisfactory
6-4
(N/A)
Needs Improvement
3-0
(N/A)
Content
X4
Excellent
All information provided by the student on the website is accurate and all the requirements of the assignment have been met. In other words, there is sufficient content in this website to learn about the topic.
Good
Almost all the information provided by the student on the web site is accurate and all requirements of the assignment have been met. Or all the info. is accurate but not all of the requirements of the assignment were met.
Satisfactory
Almost all of the info. provided by the student on the web site is accurate and almost all of the requirements have been met.
Needs Improvement
There are several inaccuracies in the content provided by the students AND all requirements of content are not met.
Learning of Material
Excellent
The student has an exceptional understanding of the material in the site including the 5 themes of Geography. Can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the website.
Good
The student has a good understanding of the material included in the site. Can answer most questions about the content and making of the website.
Satisfactory
The student has a fair understanding of the material included in the site. Can answer questions about content and creation of website but struggles at time to explain.
Needs Improvement
Student did not appear to learn much from this project. Cannot answer many questions about websites content or creation.
Links
Excellent
Every unit has a link. All links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites in the works cited AND all the links work.
Good
Almost all links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites in the works cited OR there are 1-2 links missing however they all worked.
Satisfactory
Most links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites in the works cited or there are too few links AND some links do not work correctly.
Needs Improvement
Less than 1/2 of the links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites in the works cited or less than 1/2 of the units have links. Several links struggle to work.
Graphics
Excellent
Graphics are used for every unit and are related to the theme/purpose of the site. They are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Good
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, and are of good quality. They enhance reader interest or understanding. However, one unit is missing graphics.
Satisfactory
Graphics are present but are either of poor quality or do not all clearly relate to theme/purpose.
Needs Improvement
Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of poor quality, and do not enhance reader interest or understanding.
Layout
Excellent
The web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. Graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material. Headings are used to assist viewer.
Good
The web pages have an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate important elements. Elements and space are used effectively most of the time. Have headings most of the time which help organize page.
Satisfactory
The web pages have a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements. Have headings some of the time.
Needs Improvement
The web pages are cluttered looking, confusing, or boring. It is often difficult to locate important elements. Headings are often missing.
Navigation
Excellent
Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages (forward and back), and take the reader where they expect to go. A user does not become lost.
Good
Links for navigation are labeled, allow the reader to move easily from a page to related pages (forward and back), and internal links take the reader where they expect to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Satisfactory
Links for navigation take the reader where they expect to go, but some needed links seem to be missing. A user can get lost.
Needs Improvement
Some links do not take the reader to the sites described. A user typically feels lost or struggles to navigate.
Work Ethic
Excellent
Student always uses classroom project time well. Conversations are primarily focused on the project and things needed to get the work done. Students does NOT disrupt others. Quickly volunteers to assist others when asked.
Good
Student usually uses classroom project time well. Most conversation is focused on the project and things needed to get the work done. Student most often does NOT disrupt others. Occasionally assists others.
Satisfactory
Student usually uses classroom project time well, but occasionally distracts others from their work.
Needs Improvement
Student does not use classroom project time well OR typically is disruptive.
Color Choices/Background/Font
Excellent
Colors of background, font, and links do not detract but enhance understanding. Background adds to the theme or purpose. Fonts are consistent, easy to read.
Good
Colors of background, font, and links do not detract and are consistent. Background does not distract and is attractive. Fonts are consistent, easy to read.
Satisfactory
Colors of background, font, and links do not detract but could do a better job with enhancing site. Fonts are consistent but sometimes are difficult to read.
Needs Improvement
Colors of background, font, and links make the content hard to read. There is little consistency of font.
Interest
Excellent
The author has made an exceptional attempt to make the content of this web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
Good
The author has tried to make the content of this web site interesting to the viewer(s).
Satisfactory
The author has put a lot of information in the web site but there is little evidence that the person tried to present the information in an interesting way.
Needs Improvement
The author has provided only the minimum amount of information and has not transformed the information to make it more interesting to the audience
Works Cited/Citation
Excellent
Student has used proper citation format within pages and has created a source page and graphics
page using MLA format. No mistakes.
Good
Student has used proper citation format within pages but has missed a couple citations. Student has created source page and graphics page using MLA format.
Satisfactory
Student has cited sources within pages but not always with proper format. Student created source page and graphics page using MLA format but has mistakes.
Needs Improvement
Student has cited little within pages and has an incomplete source page and/or graphics page.
Spelling/Grammar
Excellent
There are either no spelling or grammatical errors, or there may be one to two minor errors in the entire site.
Good
There are a few spelling and/or grammatical errors (4-6) in the entire site.
Satisfactory
There are several spelling and/or grammatical errors (7-10) in the entire site.
Needs Improvement
There are many spelling and/or grammatical errors (11+) in the entire site.
Subjects:
Geography
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Geography rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.