iRubric: Criteria for Interviewing Skills rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Criteria for Interviewing Skills Criteria for Interviewing Skills This rubric will help to assess how good my interviewing skills are. Rubric Code: B4WB3W By dlukac Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Writing Grade Levels: (none)

Criteria for Interviewing Skills Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Language was familiar Jargon was not used when these questions were asked	Poor Questions used jargon without explanation.	Fair Jargon was defined, but the questions had language that was unfamiliar to informants.	Good Specialized vocabulary, jargon, and other references to subject of interview were explained.
Questions were clear The questions given clearly communicated what the researcher wanted to know.	Poor Questions were broad and confusing to the informant.	Fair Questions explained with familiar language but didn't completely communicate what the researcher wanted.	Good Complex questions were not used so that the informant felt comfortable enough to share their experiences in the online classroom.
Open Ended Questions Were the questions used for the interview open ended?	Poor Questions could be answered with a "yes" or "no".	Fair Most but not all questions were answered with "yes" or "no"	Good Questions led to discussion without "yes" or "no" answers.
Interviewer's neutral Interviewer did not take sides in the interview, but remained neutral	Poor Leading questions were given constantly.	Fair Some questions were leading and some responses of the interviewee were received as leading.	Good Ethics was used because it is unethical for the interviewer to form opinions. The interviewer remained neutral.
Social skills	Poor Interviewer rushed through the interview, speech was difficult to hear or understand ,did not pay attention to the person interviewed, and/or was not polite to the person interviewed.	Fair Interviewer paid some attention to the person interviewed, speech was sometimes too quiet or hard to understand, and/or the interviewer was impolite some of the time.	Good Interviewer was polite. Interviewer did not speak too fast or too slowly. Interviewer was attentive to the answers and questions of the person interviewed.
Questions generated answers The interview generated answers related to the subject the interviewer was researching.	Poor Interviewee got off track and didn't stay on the main idea being researched.	Fair Guiding questions were used but did not reflect the purposes of the interview	Good Great questions and guiding questions were used to keep the informants talking.All the research wasn't addressed but a portion of the research was addressed.