Skip to main content

iRubric: Ethics - Reaction Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Ethics - Reaction Paper 
Rubric Code: B325B5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Law  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Ethics
  Below Average

5 pts

Average

10 pts

Proficient

15 pts

Outstanding

20 pts

Content & Development

Below Average

The writer uses no or little evidence from the ethical principles and tests to back up his or her ideas. Does not have a clear central idea or does not respond appropriately to the
assignment. The piece is too short in length. There are few details and/or no or few relevant details included in the writing.
Average

The writer uses some evidence from ethical principles and tests to back up his or her ideas. Presents central idea in general terms.
Usually does not acknowledge other
views. The piece is an acceptable length and includes some details.
Proficient

The writer uses sufficient evidence to back up his or her ideas. Clearly
states the central idea, but may
have minor lapses in development.
The piece is an appropriate length. Some details are used to back up the writer's ideas.
Outstanding

The writer effectively uses evidence to back up his or her ideas. Central
idea is clearly communicated, follows a logical sequence.
The piece is an appropriate length. Many details are used to back up the writer's ideas.
Organization & Structure

Below Average

The writer does not use paragraphs effectively to break up ideas presented in the writing. An introduction, body, or conclusion are lacking from the piece.
Average

The writer uses paragraphs somewhat effectively to break up ideas presented in the writing. An introduction, body, and conclusion are present, but may not be fully developed.
Proficient

The writer uses paragraphs to break up ideas in the writing. An introduction, body, and conclusion are included and mostly developed but not quite fully developed.
Outstanding

The writer uses paragraphs very effectively to break up ideas in the writing. An introduction, body, and conclusion are included and well developed.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling

Below Average

Many spelling and grammar mistakes are evident. Some of these mistakes interfere with the meaning and understanding of the piece.
Average

Some spelling and grammar mistakes are evident. These mistakes do not interfere with the understanding of the piece.
Proficient

Few or no spelling and grammar mistakes are evident. These mistakes do not interfere with the understanding of the piece.
Outstanding

No spelling or grammar mistakes are evident. There is nothing that interfered with the understanding of the piece.
Ethical Issues- Substantive

Below Average

- Insensitive to ethical issues. No discussion.
Average

- Recognizes ethical issues but unable to analyze them. Little discussion.
Proficient

- Recognized ethical issues in the case
- Suggest solutions to addressing the issues and analyzes them. Sufficient discussion.
Outstanding

-Recognized ethical issues in the case
-Suggest solutions to addressing the issues
-Uses examples of ethical principles and tests to discuss the ethical issues and come to a conclusion after a thorough analysis. Great discussion.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178