Skip to main content

iRubric: Final Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Final Paper Rubric for assessing the final paper assignment in 465B, an essay based on an interview with a woman leader who changed an organization Rubric Code: B2W624 By trefalt Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Graduate

Final Paper Rubric for assessing the final paper assignment in 465B
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 2 pts
Form 20 %
Clarity and persuasiveness 4 pts	Poor Unclear, confused, and unpersuasive articulation and explication of ideas.	Fair Somewhat clear and persuasive articulation and explication of ideas.	Good Clear and persuasive articulation and explication of ideas.
Grammar and syntax 2 pts	Poor Frequent or consistent improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.	Fair Occasional improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.	Good Proper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.
Spelling and typographical errors 2 pts	Poor More than three spelling or typographical errors	Fair One, two, or three spelling or typographical errors	Good No spelling or typographical errors
Structure and formatting 2 pts	Poor No use of formatting to emphasize structure of the paper.	Fair Modest use of headings and other formatting to structure the content, but not in a way that enhances its clarity.	Good Use of headings and other formatting to structure the content and enhance its clarity.
Length 2 pts	Poor The paper is more than 20% too long	Fair The paper is up to 20% too long	Good The length of the paper is within the guidelines
Content 65 %
Thesis/Argument 3 pts	Poor The choice of the woman leader is not supported and/or the point of view about leading organizational change is unclear and confused	Fair The choice of the woman leader is not clearly supported and/or the point of view about leading organizational change is somewhat clear	Good The choice of the woman leader is well supported and the point of view about leading organizational change is clearly presented
New learning 1.5 pts	Poor The paper offers no new insights into the process of organizational change	Fair The paper offers limited new insights into the process of organizational change	Good The paper offers new insights into the process of organizational change
Theoretical underpinning 1.5 pts	Poor The concepts covered in class are not used consistently and/or are applied inappropriately	Fair The concepts covered in class are used and applied appropriately	Good The concepts covered in class are used and applied appropriately and linked across in ways that increase understanding of organizational change
Data presentation 1.5 pts	Poor The interviewee and the organizational change are not presented clearly, systematically, and succinctly	Fair The interviewee and the organizational change are presented somewhat clearly, systematically, and succinctly	Good The interviewee and the organizational change are presented clearly, systematically, and succinctly
Analysis 1.5 pts	Poor The analysis of the effectiveness of the organizational change under study and the effectiveness of its leader has significant flaws	Fair The effectiveness of the organizational change under study and the effectiveness of its leader are analyzed well, but some aspects of the analysis are lacking or flawed	Good The effectiveness of the organizational change under study and the effectiveness of its leader are thoroughly analyzed
Legitimacy of conclusions 3 pts	Poor The conclusions are not supported by data and analysis	Fair Some conclusions are supported by data and analysis and others are not	Good The conclusions are thoroughly supported by data and analysis
Planning 15 %
Interviewee 6 pts	Poor The selection of the interviewee was not coordinated with other students and/or with the professor	Fair Interviewee was selected later than agreed upon but the selection was coordinated with other students and with the professor	Good Interviewee was selected in a timely manner and the selection was coordinated with other students and with the professor
Questionnaire 6 pts	Poor Questions are unfocused and promise to lead to very flawed understanding of the organizational change and the interviewee's role in it	Fair Questions range from thoughtful to unfocused, and promise to lead to partial understanding of the organizational change and the interviewee's role in it	Good Questions are thoughtful, focused, and promise to lead to deep and detailed understanding of the organizational change and the interviewee's role in it

Subjects:

Business

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Business rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202