Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Research Proposal rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Research Proposal
Lab Report
University, Science, Brief Research Proposal/Thesis course
Rubric Code:
B23A3C
By
awall4
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Science Research Proposal
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Background
Excellent
Excellent background information given,
Concise and clear
Good
Background is somewhat clear and concise, Only a few details missing for clarity
Fair
Some important background information missing, some issues in clarity due to missing information
Poor
Major portions of the background information is lacking, very unclear.
Rationale
Excellent
Clear rationale stated, very clear why studies are being proposed.
Good
Some rationale given, somewhat clear why study will be completed
Fair
Rationale not clear, not completely sure why studies are being proposed
Poor
No rationale is stated, no reasons were given why study is being proposed.
Hypothesis
Excellent
Clearly defined and testable hypothesis
Good
Hypothesis is somewhat clearly defined
Fair
Hypothesis not clear and is not stated properly (not a testable statement)
Poor
No hypothesis is stated
Methods
Excellent
Clear list of methods, well described, containing all essential information (ex. drug concentrations, cell types used, etc.)
Good
Minor errors or omissions in the methods portion
Fair
Some details missing in the methods sections, but still clear what experiments will be completed
Poor
Major details missing from the methods (cell types, major experiments, etc.)
Anticipated Results
Excellent
Anticipated results were clearly stated, consistent with the hypothesis
Good
some anticipated results were stated
Fair
some anticipated results were stated, but was no consistent with the hypothesis
Poor
No anticipated results were discussed
References
Excellent
Excellent references, consistent formatting, no more than 15 references listed.
Good
Some inconsistencies in references, but properly completed (no facts left unreferenced)
Fair
Insufficient referencing (not all published facts were referenced properly), less than 6 references listed.
Poor
Improper referencing, not completed and/or few (less than 3) references listed
Grammar/Spelling
Excellent
1-2 spelling errors and grammatical errors. Well organized and carefully edited
Good
Some spelling and grammar errors (3-5)
Fair
Grammatical and spelling errors (5-10), not enough attention paid to details
Poor
Major grammatical and spelling errors, no attention paid to detail.
Keywords:
science lab
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.