Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Broadcast Story Package rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Broadcast Story Package
Broadcast Story Package
Students will produce a complete broadcast package. (voice-over/soundbites/standup/B-roll
Rubric Code:
B2326C5
By
pfliegma
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Journalism
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
News Story
4
(N/A)
3.5
(N/A)
3
(N/A)
2
(N/A)
Topic (x1)
4
Student(s) properly engage in an interesting topic regarding a school or local issue/event.
3.5
Student(s) choose an issue or event to cover.
3
Student(s) require ideas to generate a package idea.
2
Topic teacher generated
Organization (x2)
4
Information is gathered from multiple electronic non-electronic sources and reliable interviews.
3.5
Information is gathered from multiple electronic and non-electronic sources and reliable sources, but more information is required.
3
Information is gathered from limited electronic and non-electronic sources and other sources.
2
Little information is gathered from non-electronic or electronic sources only. Interviews don't add to the strength of overall package. Too much teacher input.
Production
4
(N/A)
3.5
(N/A)
3
(N/A)
2
(N/A)
Idea (x1)
4
Accurately addresses topic and generates viewer interest.
3.5
Generates interest. Topic addressed well, but some points vague.
3
Describes issue fairly well but does not generate viewer interest, nor are thoughts complete.
2
Does not address issue or topic well . Does not generate interest.
Sequencing (x1)
4
Information is in logical, interesting sequence which the viewer can follow.
3.5
Student(s) present information in logical sequence which the viewer can follow.
3
The viewer has difficulty following work because student jumps around.
2
Sequence of information is difficult to follow.
Interview Setup (x2)
4
All W's and H are accurately and logically answered Student(s) generated informed questions and set up appointments.
3.5
W's and H are accurately and logically answered.
3
Some of the W's and H are asked, but follow-up questions are missing which would have added to the story.
2
Poor questioning and listening skills .
Interview Conducting (x2)
4
If needed, both pro and con source evident in final project. Rule of Thirds and composition of subject well-done.
Two shot and reverse shot included.
3.5
Student(s) accurately conduct appropriate interviews of sources.
Composition of subject is good. Two shot and reverse shot included.
3
Interviews completed, but not well-done.
Composition of subject is fair. Missing reversal and/or two shot.
2
Student(s) conduct interview(s) and/or it is conducted immaturely and inaccurately.
Composition of subject is poor. Missing reversal and/ or two shot.
Conventions/Voiceover (x1)
4
Audio does not have grammatical errors, well-paced. Talent is easily understood.
3.5
No grammatical errors, but sentence structure distracts the listener.
3
Some grammatical errors. Script structure awkward for the listener.
2
Poorly written and poorly paced.
B-Roll (x3)
4
Location shots, composition, choice of visuals add to the package. Camera work is superb.
3.5
B-roll is good, but shots could have been more varied. Camera work is good.
3
The B-roll and composition is boring and fails to catch viewer's attention. Camera work needs attention.
2
Poor B-roll. Limited effort is obvious in location shots and composition. Poor camera work.
Post-Production
4
(N/A)
3.5
(N/A)
3
(N/A)
2
(N/A)
Editing (x3)
4
Varied shots and crisp editing moves story along. Visually attractive and follows storyline.
3.5
Visual storytelling good , but the editing could be cleaner.
3
Editing distracts from the story in a few areas.
2
Poorly edited and the viewer is distracted throughout the package.
Effects/Text (x2)
4
Effects/Transitions are justified and lower-third text applied to subjects and talent.
3.5
Effects and lower third text evident.
3
Effects may be overdone and lower thirds not applied where needed.
2
Effects missing or overdone. Limited or no lower third text.
Natural Sound/ Audio Levels (x2)
4
Student makes appropriate audio adjustments for voice overs, natural sound and interviewees.
3.5
Audio adjustments could have been made in the segment, but overall well done.
3
Audio levels are distracting in areas of the package.
2
Audio levels are poorly monitored. This would not be air able.
Story Content
4
(N/A)
3.5
(N/A)
3
(N/A)
2
(N/A)
Inform & Educate (x2)
4
Idea or topic is well-addressed and generates interest.
3.5
Generates viewer interest.
3
Addresses issue or topic but does not generate viewer interest.
2
Does not describe event or topic well and does not generate viewer interest.
Standup (x1)
4
The standup bridges well and is not only creative but adds to the overall appeal of the story. Composition is excellent.
3.5
The standup is included in the package.
3
The standup does not add to the story and is not scripted well .
2
The standup is either missing or poorly done.
Creativity
4
(N/A)
3.5
(N/A)
3
(N/A)
2
(N/A)
Artistic Technique (x1)
4
Original. Visually engaging. Style compliments and enhances message.
3.5
Package done well, but lacks artistic elements.
3
Package complete with elements, but falls below expectations.
2
Package incomplete or falls well below expectiations.
Effective Message (x1)
4
Story unfolds in a logical and intriguing way. Demonstrates original thinking and careful scripting.
3.5
Story follows a logical thread and holds interest.
- Video reflects script and supports message.
3
Story follows a logical thread but fails to hold interest.
2
Story is disjointed and hard to follow. Information is confusing.
Keywords:
News Story, Broadcast Journalism
Subjects:
Journalism
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Journalism rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.