Skip to main content
iRubric: Science Project Log Book Rubric

iRubric: Science Project Log Book Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Science Project Log Book Rubric 
Science Fair Logbook Rubric
Rubric Code: AXX9A33
By ronsonetl
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Science Fair Logbook
Enter rubric description
  Not Evident

0 pts

Needs Improvement

1 pts

Acceptable

Earning a 2 in each category will result in a grade of 70.

2 pts

Exemplary

3 pts

Neatness and Organization

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

Two or more pages don't meet the criteria for exemplary work.
Acceptable

One page doesn't meet the criteria for exemplary work.
Exemplary

Logbook written legibly using blue or black ink.

All pages are numbered.

All pages are dated.

Only one side of each page is written on.
Title Page

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

More than one requirement for the title page is omitted.
Acceptable

Not placed in the front of log book, but title and student name are present.
Exemplary

First page of notebook, project title and student name included
Table of Contents

Enter description
Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

Two or more mistakes on the Table of Contents
Acceptable

One mistake on the Table of Contents
Exemplary

First page of notebook is a Table of Contents.

Table of Contents has correct pages numbers listed for each section.
Due Dates

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

More than one due date is missing.
Acceptable

One due date is missing.
Exemplary

All due dates are listed.
Background Research Notes

Enter description
Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

Consists of one page or less of background research. Notes are minimal.

Source(s) is/are not listed for more than 1-2 sets of information.
Acceptable

Consists of more than one page. Notes look less than thorough.

Source(s) is/are not listed for 1-2 sets of information.
Exemplary

Consists of several pages of thorough notes from background research.

Source(s) for information is/are clearly listed.
Hypothesis

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

Hypothesis is missing more than one of the required parts or is not written in the correct format.
Acceptable

Hypothesis is missing one of the required parts.
Exemplary

Hypothesis is written in one of the following formats:

If ____, then ____, because _____.
Materials

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

Materials list is missing more than 2 items that would be required for the project.
Acceptable

Materials list is missing 1-2 items that would be required for the project.
Exemplary

Materials list is thorough and complete. No additions are needed.
Procedure

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

Methods are missing more than 2 steps that would be required to carry out the project.
Acceptable

Methods are missing 1-2 steps that would be required to carry out the project.
Exemplary

Methods are a complete list of procedures required to carry out the project.

Project could be carried out by a different person using only the provided materials and the steps in the Methods to follow as directions.
Variables

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

More than one of the variables is not correctly identified.
Acceptable

One of the variables is not correctly identified.
Exemplary

Independent variable is correctly identified.

Dependent variable is correctly identified.

Three constants are correctly identified.
Data Collection

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

Observations are not sufficiently detailed and three trials are not documented.
Acceptable

Observations are not sufficiently detailed or three trials are not documented.
Exemplary

Both qualitative and quantitative detailed observations are documented for a minimum of three trials.
Results

Not Evident

No work is evident for this section of the rubric.
Needs Improvement

Graphs are not labeled and the conclusion does not relate back to the hypothesis.
Acceptable

Graphs are not properly labeled, or the conclusion is not related back to the hypothesis.
Exemplary

Graphs and a discussion of the conclusion for the experiment are included.
The graphs are properly labeled.
The conclusion relates back to the hypothesis.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60