iRubric: Interview Book Character rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Interview Book Character Interview Book Report Write an interview of a book character that is more conversational than question/answer Rubric Code: AXB29W4 By jbaumann Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Interview Book Report
	Excellent Above Standards 16 pts	Good Meeting Standards 13 pts	Fair Approaching Standards 10 pts	Poor Below Standards 7 pts
Introduction and Conclusion	Excellent The interview had a strong opening and concluding question/answer that captured the audience and made it easy for them to follow.	Good The interview had an opening and concluding question/answer that captured the audience.	Fair The interview did not necessarily have an introduction or conclusion	Poor There was no logical opening, closing, or flow to the interview.
Examples	Excellent Gave examples from book to support answers.	Good Usually gave examples from book to support answers.	Fair Rarely gave examples from book to support answers.	Poor Did not give examples from book to support answers.
Voice	Excellent Student answered questions in a voice appropriate to the character.	Good Voice was present. Somewhat portrayed the character through voice.	Fair Voice was inconsistent; usually did not consider the character in their written responses.	Poor Little or no voice was present. Student did not think about the character in their responses.
Sentence Fluency	Excellent -Sentences had natural flow and rhythm -Sentence length, structure, and complexity were varied.	Good -Sentences flowed. -Sentence structures were correct and varied.	Fair -Had fragmented, run-on or confusing sentences. -Sentence structures were limited in variety.	Poor Sentences were incomplete, unclear, and/or lacking in variety.
Word Choice	Excellent Used a variety of words to adequately convey the intended message of the reflection.	Good Used somewhat of a variety of words to convey the intended message of the reflection.	Fair Little variety in word choice. Didn’t adequately convey the message intended.	Poor Highly repetitive word choice with little or no descriptive language.
Conventions	Excellent Contained few if any errors in conventions that made the writing easy to read and understand.	Good Contained some convention errors that do not interfere with the meaning.	Fair Contained frequent convention errors that are noticeable and slow or confuse the reader.	Poor Contained so many convention errors that the writing is difficult to follow.