Skip to main content

iRubric: MyPlate Project Assessment Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
MyPlate Project Assessment Rubric MyPlate Project Assessment Rubric This rubric identifies the the attributes of student progress in completing the My Plate Project research and presentation Rubric Code: AX85647 By Smithll1 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

My Plate Project 60 points total
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 7 pts	Exceeds 10 pts
My Plate Worksheet -Completion -Accuracy -Use of My Plate.gov website	Poor More than 5 facts are inaccurate and/or are left incomplete on the Worksheet.	Fair 3-4 facts on the Worksheet are inaccurate/left incomplete and do not display the correct information given on the My Plate.gov website.	Good All but 1-2 facts are accurate/complete on the Worksheet. All information taken from the MyPlate.gov website.	Exceeds All facts are accurate/complete on the Worksheet. Additional facts may be present. All information is from The MyPlate.gov Website.
My Plate Notes (back of plate) -Food Group Name -Food Examples -Daily Recommendations/ Servings, Health Benefits, Tips to Eating foods from this group.	Poor 5 or more required elements are missing from notes. There are 10 or more spelling, grammatical, and punctuation errors. Layout is not followed. Printing or font is easy to read contributing to understanding.	Fair 3-4 required elements are missing from notes. There are 5 to 9 or more spelling, grammatical, and punctuation errors. Layout is minimally followed. Printing or font is marginally easy to read contributing to understanding.	Good All but 1-2 of the required elements are included in the notes. There are 3 to 5 spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors. Layout is followed. Printing/Font is easy to read contributing to understanding.	Exceeds Notes include all required elements. There are 1 to 2 spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors. Layout is followed. Printing/Font is easy to read contributing to understanding.
Work effort -Effort -Quality -Neat	Poor Group Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learners are capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.	Fair Group Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learners are capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.	Good The Group Work was done with good effort that shows what the learner are capable of. It is evident that time was put into this poster and presentation.	Exceeds The Group Work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the learners are proud of their work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learners.
My Plate Collage (front of plate) -Use of images representing foods from food group assigned. Color is added Variety of foods are shown	Poor Lacks creativity. Not good use of space on collage. Messy. Lacks color.	Fair Not very appealing. Limited use of food images. Not a lot of color/shapes/design.	Good Contains good creativity. Lots of colors, shapes, and appealing design. Shows the student spent time creating an artistic piece. Shows are large variety of foods from the food group.	Exceeds Eye catching. Great use of colors, shapes, and spacing on poster. Artwork is neat. Writing is easy to read. A large variety of foods from the food group are shown in the collage.
Presentation -Eye contact, Engaging Communication Follows a logical order when giving facts.	Poor Presenter does not engage audience or use eye contact. No logical organization to the presentation is evident.	Fair Minimal engagement of audience and eye contact. Presentation minimally follows a logical format.	Good Moderate engagement of audience and good eye contact. Presentation follows a logical order.	Exceeds Presentation engages the audience with maximum eye contact. Presentation in logical order.
Food Sample -Food sample qualifies in food group -Quantity of food sample was accurate amount for entire class	Poor Food sample was not provided.	Fair Sample did not fit into food group, provided enough for students to sample.	Good Sample accurately fit into food group, provided a minimal amount for students to sample.	Exceeds Sample accurately fit into food group, provided enough for students to sample.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Geology rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n7