Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: To Drop the Atomic Bomb or Not? Make your case! rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
To Drop the Atomic Bomb or Not? Make your case!
To Drop the Atomic Bomb or Not? Make your case!
In this assigment, you will decide whether you are for or against the dropping the the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagaski and defend your position. The essay should be 3 to 5 paragraphs, typed, spell checked and proofread. It should have an introduction explaining your position, at least one paragraph, using actual historical events which defend your position and a conclusion. Use this rubric to guide your writing.
Rubric Code:
AX7953A
By
w2teach4u
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Pro or Con
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Introduction (organization)
Excellent
The introduction clearly states your position and effectively outlines how you will defend your position.
Good
The introduction states your position and reasonabley outlines how you will defend your position.
Fair
The introduction states your position and gives some indication how you will defend it.
Needs Improvement
The introduction is poorly written and hard to understand and does not clearly state your position or how you will defend it.
Body (content)
Excellent
Gives the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable, effectively defends position and uses historical events to effectively support position.
Good
Gives the reader information which effectively defends position and uses historical events to effectively support position.
Fair
Gives the reader information that defends position and uses historical events to somewhat support position.
Needs Improvement
Little or no information is given to defend position and historical events are either not used or do not support position.
Conclusion (organization)
Excellent
The reader clearly understands the writer's position, thesis statement is rewritten and main point of paper is summarized.
Good
The reader understands the writer's position, thesis statement is rewritten and main point of paper is summarized.
Fair
The reader somewhat understands the writer's position, thesis statement is somewhat rewritten and main point of paper is mentioned.
Needs Improvement
Writer has not summarized main point of paper and clearly does not restate thesis statement.
Structure
Excellent
Paper no spelling errors, is grammatically correct and has obviously been proofread. Paper is typed.
Good
Paper has fewer than 2 spelling errors, is mostly grammatically correct and has obviously been proofread. Paper is typed.
Fair
Paper has fewer than 4 spelling errors, is somewhat grammatically correct and might have been proofread. Paper is typed.
Needs Improvement
Paper has numerous spelling errors, is not grammatically correct and has obviously not been proofread. Paper is not typed or is typed poorly.
Subjects:
History
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.