Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: AVID Island Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
AVID Island Project
AVID Island Project
Rubric Code:
AX4A59A
By
khaukaas
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
AVID Island
Excellent
25 pts
Good
20 pts
Fair
15 pts
Poor
10 pts
Poster
TITLE
Excellent
Group has created a unique title and it is included on the poster in an attractive manner.
Good
Group has created a title for their Island and it is on the Poster.
Fair
Group has created a title for their poster but it
Poor
No Title displayed on poster.
Island Shape
Excellent
Students have created a unique shape for their Island(s) and it is displayed on the poster in an attractive and.or creative way.
Good
Group has created a unique shape for its island, but it is not colored or displayed for easy viewing.
Fair
Group has created a shape for its island, but the shape is not unique and is not attractively incorporated into their poster.
Poor
No island is drawn onto final poster.
Motto
Excellent
The group has displayed their unique and creative motto for their island attractively on their poster.
Good
The group has included their motto on the poster, but it is not displayed creatively.
Fair
The group has displayed their motto on the poster, but it is unrelated to their island's theme. Writing may be
Poor
No motto is included on the final poster.
Island Currency
Excellent
The group has graphically and creatively displayed their Island Currency and explained its design.
Good
The group has included their Island currency on the poster. They explain why they designed their currency in the manner they did.
Fair
The group includes their currency on the poster, but it is sloppily and hastily included and explanation of the currency is weak.
Poor
No currency is included or explained in final poster and presentation.
Flag
Excellent
The group has graphically and creatively displayed their Island Flag and explained its design
Good
The group has included their Island Flag on the poster. They explain why they designed their flag in the manner they did.
Fair
The group includes their flag on the poster, but it is sloppily and hastily included and explanation of the flag is weak.
Poor
No flag is included or explained in final poster and presentation.
Island Law
Excellent
The group has graphically and creatively displayed their Island's 1st Law and explained its design
Good
The group has included their Island Law on the poster. They explain why their law is important to the success of their island.
Fair
The group includes their flag on the poster, but it is sloppily and hastily included and explanation of the law is weak.
Poor
No Island Law is included or explained in final presentation.
Geographic Features
Excellent
The group has included at least 1 geographic feature (landforms) for each group member and given each a unique name that represents each group member.
Good
The group has included at least 1 geographic feature (landforms) for each group member and has given it a name to represent each group member.
Fair
The group has included some geographic features but they lack creativity or relationship to the group members.
Poor
The group has missing landforms, names are not displayed, and landforms displayed don't represent overall theme or
Revenue
Excellent
The group has graphically and creatively displayed their Island's Revenue Stream and explained how they make money.
Good
The group has included their Island Revenue stream on the poster. They explain why they make their money in the manner they do.
Fair
The group includes their revenue stream on the poster, but it is sloppily and hastily included and explanation of the flag is weak.
Poor
No revenue information is included or explained in final poster and presentation.
Participitation and Presentation
Excellent
50 pts
Good
40 pts
Fair
30 pts
Poor
20 pts
On- Task
Excellent
The group was on task at all times and worked together to complete the project in a timely manner. Group attitudes were positive.
Good
The group was on-task 90% of the time they were working together. Most group members worked together towards a common goal, but one group member failed to fully participate.
Fair
The group was on-task between 80-90% of the time. Half of the group members worked to complete the task, while others were off-task, argumentative, or disengaged.
Poor
The group were only on-task less than 80% the time of the project. The group often were argumentative and spent little time working towards the common goal of completion of the project.
Group Presntation
Excellent
Each member of the group presented multiple elements of the project. Presentation was clear, concise, and on topic at all times
Good
Each group member presented at least one component of their group's island. Members were prepared but
Fair
Only some group members presented elements of the island to the class. Other group members failed to participate. Presentation was unfocused at times.
Poor
Only one member of the group presented the project to the class. Presentation was unclear and lacking necessary elements.
Subjects:
Education
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.