Skip to main content
iRubric: AVID Island Project rubric

iRubric: AVID Island Project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AVID Island Project 
Rubric Code: AX4A59A
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric AVID Island
  Excellent

25 pts

Good

20 pts

Fair

15 pts

Poor

10 pts

Poster
TITLE

Excellent

Group has created a unique title and it is included on the poster in an attractive manner.
Good

Group has created a title for their Island and it is on the Poster.
Fair

Group has created a title for their poster but it
Poor

No Title displayed on poster.
Island Shape

Excellent

Students have created a unique shape for their Island(s) and it is displayed on the poster in an attractive and.or creative way.
Good

Group has created a unique shape for its island, but it is not colored or displayed for easy viewing.
Fair

Group has created a shape for its island, but the shape is not unique and is not attractively incorporated into their poster.
Poor

No island is drawn onto final poster.
Motto

Excellent

The group has displayed their unique and creative motto for their island attractively on their poster.
Good

The group has included their motto on the poster, but it is not displayed creatively.
Fair

The group has displayed their motto on the poster, but it is unrelated to their island's theme. Writing may be
Poor

No motto is included on the final poster.
Island Currency

Excellent

The group has graphically and creatively displayed their Island Currency and explained its design.
Good

The group has included their Island currency on the poster. They explain why they designed their currency in the manner they did.
Fair

The group includes their currency on the poster, but it is sloppily and hastily included and explanation of the currency is weak.
Poor

No currency is included or explained in final poster and presentation.
Flag

Excellent

The group has graphically and creatively displayed their Island Flag and explained its design
Good

The group has included their Island Flag on the poster. They explain why they designed their flag in the manner they did.
Fair

The group includes their flag on the poster, but it is sloppily and hastily included and explanation of the flag is weak.
Poor

No flag is included or explained in final poster and presentation.
Island Law

Excellent

The group has graphically and creatively displayed their Island's 1st Law and explained its design
Good

The group has included their Island Law on the poster. They explain why their law is important to the success of their island.
Fair

The group includes their flag on the poster, but it is sloppily and hastily included and explanation of the law is weak.
Poor

No Island Law is included or explained in final presentation.
Geographic Features

Excellent

The group has included at least 1 geographic feature (landforms) for each group member and given each a unique name that represents each group member.
Good

The group has included at least 1 geographic feature (landforms) for each group member and has given it a name to represent each group member.
Fair

The group has included some geographic features but they lack creativity or relationship to the group members.
Poor

The group has missing landforms, names are not displayed, and landforms displayed don't represent overall theme or
Revenue

Excellent

The group has graphically and creatively displayed their Island's Revenue Stream and explained how they make money.
Good

The group has included their Island Revenue stream on the poster. They explain why they make their money in the manner they do.
Fair

The group includes their revenue stream on the poster, but it is sloppily and hastily included and explanation of the flag is weak.
Poor

No revenue information is included or explained in final poster and presentation.
Participitation and Presentation
  Excellent

50 pts

Good

40 pts

Fair

30 pts

Poor

20 pts

On- Task

Excellent

The group was on task at all times and worked together to complete the project in a timely manner. Group attitudes were positive.
Good

The group was on-task 90% of the time they were working together. Most group members worked together towards a common goal, but one group member failed to fully participate.
Fair

The group was on-task between 80-90% of the time. Half of the group members worked to complete the task, while others were off-task, argumentative, or disengaged.
Poor

The group were only on-task less than 80% the time of the project. The group often were argumentative and spent little time working towards the common goal of completion of the project.
Group Presntation

Excellent

Each member of the group presented multiple elements of the project. Presentation was clear, concise, and on topic at all times
Good

Each group member presented at least one component of their group's island. Members were prepared but
Fair

Only some group members presented elements of the island to the class. Other group members failed to participate. Presentation was unfocused at times.
Poor

Only one member of the group presented the project to the class. Presentation was unclear and lacking necessary elements.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232