Skip to main content

iRubric: Eating Disorders Project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Eating Disorders Project 
Rubric Code: A95445
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Poor

4 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

10 pts

Points Awarded and Comments

100 pts

Story Description
20 %

Poor

*less than 2 full paragraphs that fully describe the story of the person being discussed (at least 10-15 sentences)
* included most but missing more than one of the following
- individuals
disorder
- underlying
issue
- start date
- everyday
habits
Fair

*2 full paragraphs that fully describe the story of the person being discussed (at least 10-15 sentences)
* included most but missing one of the following
- individuals
disorder
- underlying
issue
- start date
- everyday
habits
Good

*2 full paragraphs that fully describe the story of the person being discussed (at least 10-15 sentences)
* included all of the following
- individuals
disorder
- underlying
issue
- start date
- everyday
habits
Points Awarded and Comments
Intervention Plan
20 %

Poor

*Goal does not explain what they would like to successfully accomplish with the individual. Not only cure the disease, but specifically the goal they would like the individual to achieve in life.
Fair

*Goal somewhat explains what they would like to successfully accomplish with the individual. Not only cure the disease, but specifically the goal they would like the individual to achieve in life.
Good

*Goal fully explains what they would like to successfully accomplish with the individual. Not only cure the disease, but specifically the goal they would like the individual to achieve in life.
Points Awarded and Comments
Individuals Involved
20 %

Poor

*Lists all individuals that are involved but does not explain each individuals importance in this situation.
Fair

*Lists all individuals that are involved , but vaguely each individuals importance in this situation.
Good

*Lists all individuals that are involved and explains each individuals importance in this situation.
Points Awarded and Comments
5 Step Program
20 %

Poor

*5 step program does not show correct progression in a rebuilding program.
*Does not clearly explain each step and why it is there.
*Steps are not achievable and time period of which individual completes steps are unrealistic.
Fair

*Make a 5 step program that shows somewhat correct progression in a rebuilding program. (steps are not in the correct order)
*Does not clearly explain each step and why it is there.
*Steps are somewhat achievable, time period of which individual completes steps are unrealistic.
Good

*Make a 5 step program that shows correct progression in a rebuilding program. (starts with easiest step and ends/completes with hardest step)
*Clearly explains each step and why it is there.
*Shows clear and achievable steps specific to individuals disorder. Time period is realistic.
Points Awarded and Comments
Monitor Progress
20 %

Poor

*3 step program is made to clearly monitor individuals progress.
*Program does not reflect how individual can properly be monitored.
*More than 2 steps resembles items that were stated in the 5 step program.
Fair

*3 step program is made to clearly monitor individuals progress.
*Program shows how the individual will stay on task and stick to program that is set for them.
*More than 1 step resemble items that were stated in the 5 step program.
Good

*3 step program is made to clearly monitor individuals progress.
*Program shows how the individual will stay on task and stick to program that is set for them.
*Does not have the same information that was previously stated in the 5 step program.
Points Awarded and Comments
Skit
%

This is being graded out of 15 points.

Poor

Weight 5
Criteria
Does not do 3 or more of the following

*everyone has a part
*the skit reflects the same problem being solved in the project
*every member has a copy of the skit and knows when it is their turn to speak
*the skit is well thought out and makes sense
Fair

Weight 10
Criteria
Does not do 2 of the following

*everyone has a part
*the skit reflects the same problem being solved in the project
*every member has a copy of the skit and knows when it is their turn to speak
*the skit is well thought out and makes sense
Good

Weight 15
Criteria
Meets all of the marked points

*everyone has a part
*the skit reflects the same problem being solved in the project
*every member has a copy of the skit and knows when it is their turn to speak
*the skit is well thought out and makes sense
Points Awarded and Comments




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202