Skip to main content

iRubric: Community Service Group Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Community Service Group Presentation Rubric 
This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group activity on community service. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions.
Rubric Code: A7A769
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Group Presentation Rubric
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Organization

Excellent

Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.
Good

Presentation was fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away greatly from the overall presentation.
Fair

Presentation was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.
Poor

Presentation lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.
Teamwork/Participation

Excellent

The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.
Good

The group worked well with each other and communicated well. Some members participated slightly more than others.
Fair

Group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.
Poor

Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.
Content

Excellent

Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.
Good

Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.
Fair

Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.
Poor

Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.
Technology

Excellent

Technology was used effectively throughout presentation and included sound and pictures. Group members used technology as a supplement, not as a crutch.
Good

Technology was somewhat effective, but included only sound or pictures. Technology wasn't used as powerfully as possible throughout the presentation.
Fair

Technology used did not support verbal presentation. Technology displays lacked information, or groups members read from them.
Poor

Technology was not used at all.
Presentation

Excellent

Presenters were all very confident in delivery and they did an excellent job of engaging the class. Preparation is very evident
Good

Presenters were occasionally confident with their presentation however the presentation was not as engaging as it could have been for the class.
Fair

Presenters were not consistent with the level of confidence they showed the classroom but had some strong moments.
Poor

Presenters were unconfident and demonstrated little evidence of planning prior to presentation.
Focus on community

Excellent

Group project provided direct benefits to elementary, middle, and/or high school students and/or their families.
Good

Group project provided indirect benefits to elementary, middle, and/or high school students and/or their families.
Fair

Group project provided limited benefit to elementary, middle, and/or high school students and/or their families.
Poor

Group project provided very little benefit to elementary, middle, and/or high school students and/or their families.
Evaluation of Project Effectiveness

Excellent

Group project and overall presentation included evaluation methods, along with documented efforts by individuals and the group.
Good

Group project and overall presentation included an evaluation method, along with documented efforts by individuals and the group.
Fair

Group project included an evaluation method, along with documented efforts by individuals and the group.
Poor

Project included some efforts to evaluate the project effectiveness.



Keywords:
  • community service, presentation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202