iRubric: General Poster Presentation & Lesson rubric

Poster was difficult to read;
no headings;
text was too small;
pictures were unclear or missing;
list of sources missing;
information was handwritten.

Poster was hard to read or messy;
text was too small or handwritten;
pictures or drawings were too small;
poster too crowded;
only 1 or 2 sources listed.

Poster was easy to read;
clear headings;
good layout of text and pictures;
text size was readable;
text was typed;
use of colours;
good list of sources used.

Poster was easy to read;
clear headings;
good layout of text and pictures;
text size was readable;
text was typed;
use of colours;
students showed creativity and originality in poster.

Voice too soft;
hard to understand;
poor eye contact;
little explanation of information;
simply reading off of the poster; lesson only used one or two teaching methods.<BR>
Poor use of class time.

Normal voice tone; some eye contact;
some confidence and competence;
some members talked more than others;
unclear explanation of poster information; lesson contained two or three teaching methods. <BR>
Could have used class time better.

Good eye contact;
good classroom voice from most;
confident and competent;
all group members participate;
did not just read most from the poster or board;
explained some of the poster clearly; lesson contained a variety of teaching methods.
Good use of class time.

Students excited about topic;
great classroom voice from all;
great eye contact; very confident and competent;
all group members participate equally;
explanation of content; lesson contained a wide variety of teaching methods.
includes extra information not on the poster.
Excellent use of class time.

Information provided was limited; information was incorrect, incomplete or inaccurate; information was difficult to understand; Information did not fully covered topic.

Information was partly complete;
Information contained only a few errors;
Information was a little difficult to understand;
Information covered most of topic.

Information was complete and free from errors;
Information was easy to understand;
Information covered the entire topic fully.

Information was complete and free of errors;
Information was presented so whole clas could understand;
information fully covered topic and included extra material.