iRubric: Chomper's Acceleration Lab Rubric

KUES format is not followed. Knowns, Unknowns, Equations, and Sovle sections are not clearly marked or defined

Only 1 of the KUES components is documented

Only 2 of the KUES Componants are documented, a picture or vectors document the model

3 of the KUES complnents are documented and a picture or vectors document the model

In addition to the KUES format being followed a picute is drawn and vectors are documented for the model

The conclusion does not match up with the introduction and the majority of the variables are not explained. There is no attempt to make sense of the errors and any poor results are ascribed to human error.

Either the goals stated in the introduction are not completely addressed, or there is some confusion with how 1-2 of the variables affect the experiment. Good faith efforts are made to explain divergent results.

The conclusion addresses the goals mentioned in the introduction, with all of the relationships between the variables explained. Any divergent results are given a reasonable explanation.

In addition to being proficient, the conclusion incorporates the significance of the slope and intercept (when relevant) and proposes further avenues of study

Besides being advanced the conclusion is written to 11th grade english standards. Well formed paragraphs are written and flow prpoerly conveying the intent of the writer. All questions are covered and a discussion on experiment error is included. Improvements to the experiment are also explored and defense of your hypothesis position must be clearly stated.