Skip to main content
iRubric: Rubric for wiki project

iRubric: Rubric for wiki project

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric for wiki project 
Rubric for wiki project
Rubric for forensic science chapter projects.
Rubric Code: A32778
By jlandry17
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Wiki
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Glossary

Poor

Missing multiple key terms.

Incomplete/unclear definitions.
Fair

Missing atleast one key term.

Minimal definitions.
Good

Key terms all present or only one word is missing.

Definition is complete but not full of details.
Excellent

All key terms included.

Definitions are complete and detailed.
Pictures/video

Poor

Only one picture is present or pictures do not support the material.
Fair

Two pictures included but they do not support material.
Good

All three pictures included, two of which really support material.
Excellent

All three pictures included, all of which well support the material.
Key People

Poor

Missing multiple key people.

Incomplete/unclear explanations.
Fair

Missing atleast one key person.

Minimal explanations.
Good

Key people all present or only one is missing.

Explanation is complete but not full of details.
Excellent

All key people included.

Explanations are complete and detailed.
Equipment/Techniques

Poor

Missing multiple key equipment/techniques.

Incomplete/unclear explanations.
Fair

Missing atleast one equipment/techniques.

Minimal explanations.
Good

Equipment/techniquesall present or only one is missing.

Explanation is complete but not full of details.
Excellent

All key equipment/techniques included.

Explanations are complete and detailed.
Case Study

Poor

Case study shows no aparent connection to topic.
Fair

Case study is loosely connected to topic.

Minimal explanations.
Good

Case study is well connected to topic.

Explanation is complete but not full of details.
Excellent

Case study is well connected to topic.

Explanation is complete and full of details.
Content/Answers to Questions

Poor

Minimal or missing content, 3 or more factual errors.

No details or examples.
Fair

Demonstrates essentialknowledge however contains 1 -2 factual errors.

Very few details or examples.
Good

Demonstrates essential knowledge with no factual errors.

Some details and examples.
Excellent

Demonstrates in-depth knowledge.

Many details and examples.
Organization

Poor

Content has no logical organization.
Fair

Content has some logical organization.
Good

Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize topics.
Excellent

Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize topics and group related material.
Originality

Poor

Material on the wiki is not summarized/ paraphrased
Fair

•Material on the wiki is not summarized/ weakly paraphrased

• Some text does not make sense/or is not relevant to the topic
Good

•Material on the wiki is summarized, not copied

• Some text does not make sense/or is not relevant to the topic
Excellent

•Material on the wiki is summarized, not copied

•The text makes sense and is relevant to the topic
Works Cited

Poor

Several sources are not included or not in MLA format.
Fair

Missing 1 source or not in MLA format.
Good

All sources present but there are mistakes with the MLA formatting.
Excellent

All sources are present and in MLA format.
Citation

Poor

Paraphrases material without citing sources.
Fair

Does not give credit to most sources.

Uses improper format for citing sources.
Good

Most sources are cited and quoted text accounted for (including multimedia links or embedded material)

Uses proper format for citing format with minor errors.
Excellent

All sources are cited and quoted text accounted for (including multimedia links or embedded material)

Uses proper format for citing sources.
Accuracy

Poor

Four or more errors in spelling or grammar. Constant use of inappropriate abbreviations.

More than one broken link.
Fair

Three errors in spelling or grammar.
Some use of inappropriate abbreviations.

One broken link.
Good

One or two errors in spelling or grammar.
No use of inappropriate abbreviations.

No broken links.
Excellent

No misspellings or grammatical errors and no use of inappropriate abbreviations.

No broken links.
Attractiveness

Poor

No use of colour, font, graphics or multimedia to enhance look of wiki OR use is very excessive and distracting.
Fair

Some use of colour, font, graphics or multimedia to enhance look of wiki OR use is somewhat excessive and distracting.
Good

Appropriate use of colour, font, graphics or multimedia to enhance look of wiki. Visual choices do not distract from content.
Excellent

Excellent use of colour, font, graphics or multimedia to enhance presentation.



Keywords:
  • wiki


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232