Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Topic review rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Topic review
Writing a review rubric
Students write a review about a self-selected topic after reading and examining the components of effective reviews in selected poems.
Rubric Code:
A2XC987
By
gracie0517
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Reflection
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Write a Review
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Unsatisfactory
1 pts
Summary of key components
Excellent
Writer gives a brief summary of topic, including enough info to satisfy; examples and evidence from summary strongly support reviewer’s opinion
Good
Summary is either a little too long or not long enough but is not quite as compelling; fewer details from the movie and evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion
Fair
Summary is either much too short or much too long; may be vague or tell too much; few details about the topic and little evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion
Unsatisfactory
An insignificant summary; no details and little evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion
Evaluation of various aspects
Excellent
Contains exceptional and knowledgeable evaluation of many aspects of topic. Reader would view writer as a recognizable expert.
Good
Contains sufficient and basic knowledge of many aspects of the topic. Reader would view writer as a competent evaluator of the topic.
Fair
Contains less than sufficient and basic knowledge of many aspects of the topic. Reader would view writer as a less than competent evaluator of the topic.
Unsatisfactory
Contains insufficient and unsatisfactory knowledge of many aspects of the topic. Reader would view writer as a incompetent evaluator of the topic.
Effective organization and flow
Excellent
Review is strongly organized with clear transitions and logical connections that create a sense of being tightly woven together
Good
Review is organized and most transitions and connections are clear, but either organization is somewhat lacking or the sense of fow is somewhat abrupt
Fair
Review lacks strong organization; jumps around too much or lacks effective transitions; not in logical order
Unsatisfactory
Review is choppy or incohesive; organization is unclear; few effective transitions
Persuasive strategies
Excellent
Writer competently utililzed many strategies to persuade the reader of the value of the item being reviewed.
Good
Writer generally utililzed sufficient strategies to persuade the reader of the value of the item being reviewed.
Fair
Writer used basic strategies to persuade the reader of the value of the item being reviewed.
Unsatisfactory
Writer incompetently used persuasive stategies or underutilized strategies to persuade the reader of the value of the item being reviewed.
.
Sentence Structure and Fluency
Excellent
Every sentence is well constructed with no run-on or fragmented sentences. Each sentence is clear concise and well-developed. Ideas and details are well supported through a varitey of sentence types.
Good
The majority of sentences are well constructed with few run-on or fragmented sentences. The majority of sentences are clear concise and well-developed. Ideas and details are mostly supported through a varitey of sentence types.
Fair
The majority of sentences are constructed well, although some run-on or fragmented sentences impede meaning. Some of the sentences are not clear, concise or well-developed. Ideas and details are somewhat supported through a varitey of sentence types.
Unsatisfactory
Too many sentences are not well constructed thus impeding reader understanding and enjoyment. Too many sentences are not clear concise. Lack of varitey of sentence types is evident.
Enhancements
Excellent
Writer competently used visual enhancements to significantly improve the review.
Good
Writer satisfactoraly used visual enhancements to generally improve the review.
Fair
Writer used visual enhancements to in a limited way or visual elements did not significanly improve the qulaity the review.
Unsatisfactory
Writer did not visual enhancements visual elements or the elements used detracted from the overall qulaity the review.
Final evaluation
Excellent
Review offers a clear conclusion or evaluation or rating with a clear recommendation to others.
Good
Conclusion is satisfactory but is lacking of a clear final evaluation or rating.
Fair
A conclusion is present, but it's weak and lacking of a clear final evaluation
Unsatisfactory
No conclusion is present.
Keywords:
review
Subjects:
English
Education
Types:
Reading
Writing
Reflection
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Reading rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.