Skip to main content
iRubric: Dramatization (Romeo & Juliet) rubric

iRubric: Dramatization (Romeo & Juliet) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Dramatization (Romeo & Juliet) 
Story Dramatization
Rubric Code: A2W767X
By krmindanao
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Dramatization
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Needs Improvement

4 pts

Poor

2 pts

Characterization

Excellent

*Students present their character with exceptional energy and enthusiasm.

*Students clearly distinguishes the character(s) from self through voice and movement.

*Students stay in character throughout the entire performance.
Good

*Students present their character with energy and enthusiasm.

*Students distinguishe the character(s) from self through voice or movement.

*Students stay in character while actively engaged in the performance.
Fair

*Students present their character with some energy and enthusiasm.

*Students attempt to distinguish the character(s) from self through voice or movement.

*Students stay in character through most of the scene.
Needs Improvement

*Students present their character with slight energy and enthusiasm.

*Students distinguish the character(s) from self through voice and movement.

*Students stay in character for parts of the scene.
Poor

*Students do not present characters with energy or enthusiasm.

*Students do not distinguish the character(s) from self.

*Students are unable to stay in character.
Organization/Preparedness

Excellent

*Students are very well prepared for their presentation.

*Transitions are seamlessly worked into the presentation.
Good

*Students are prepared for their presentation.

*Transitions are smooth.
Fair

*Student are mostly prepared for their presentation.

*Transitions are usually smooth.
Needs Improvement

*Students are partially prepared for their presentation.

*Transitions were a little bit confusing.
Poor

*Students are unprepared for their presentation.

*The story had to stop for transitions, because there was confusion.
Volume & Articulation

Excellent

*Voices were loud and clear throughout the entire presentation.
Good

*Voices were loud and clear for almost the entire presentation. (almost loud/clear)
Fair

*Voices were loud and clear for parts of the presentation.
(a little too quiet/ sloppy)
Needs Improvement

*Voices were rarely loud and clear for the presentation.
(very quiet/sloppy)
Poor

*Voices were not loud or clear for the presentation.
Use of Props & Set

Excellent

*Use of props/set greatly enhances the audience's understanding of the plot and characters.

*Student was comfortable with using the items.
Good

*Use of props/set enhances the audience's understanding of the plot and characters.

*Student was usually comfortable with using the items.
Fair

*Use of props/set slightly enhances the audience's understanding of the plot and characters.

*Student was sometimes comfortable with using the items.
Needs Improvement

*Use of props/set did not inhibit the audience's understanding of the plot and characters.

*Student was uncomfortable with using the items.
Poor

*Use of props/set inhibited the audience's understanding of the plot and characters.

*Student was unable to incorporate the items.
Script

Excellent

* Script was well-written, engaging, and remained loyal to the plot of the source material (despite possible changes in the time period/location).
Good

* Script was well-written, engaging, and remained loyal to the plot of the source material (despite possible changes in the time period/location). However, it had multiple grammatical errors.
Fair

* Script was understandable and loyal to the plot of the source material (despite possible changes in the time period/location). It had multiple grammatical errors.
Needs Improvement

* Script was not very well-written, engaging, or loyal to the plot of the source material (despite possible changes in the time period/location). It had multiple grammatical errors
Poor

* Script was not understandable or loyal to the source material (despite possible changes in the time period/location). It had multiple grammatical errors.
Time Limit

Excellent

* The presentation stayed within the time limit (45 minutes).
Good

* The presentation exceeded the time limit by less than 5 minutes.
Fair

* The presentation exceeded the time limit by 6 - 10 minutes.
Needs Improvement

* The presentation exceeded the time limit by 11 - 15 minutes.
Poor

* The presentation exceeded the time limit by more than 15 minutes.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232