Skip to main content
iRubric: Debate Owl or pancake position rubric

iRubric: Debate Owl or pancake position rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Debate Owl or pancake position 
Debate Owl or pancake position
Students are on debate team. Each team will gather information to support their claims in regard to their position
Rubric Code: A2C63C
By lucky8558
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Debate for Owls or pancake house
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Information given

Poor

Information given had at least one main point, but was not backed up by any documented proof.
Fair

Information given had at least two main points, and some was backed up by documented proof.
Good

Information given had at least three main points, and backed up by documented proof.
Excellent

Information given had at least five main points, and backed up by documented proof.
Preparedness

Poor

Team had to look back at notes three or more times. Most members contributed to the debate verbally. Team had examples.
Fair

Team had to look back at notes more than twice. Most member contributed to the debate verbally. Team had no examples.
Good

Team had to look back at notes less than twice. Each member contributed to the debate verbally at least once. Team had examples.
Excellent

Team did not have to look back at notes at all. Each member contributed to the debate verbally at least once. Team had examples.
Articulation

Poor

Students were not verbally appropriate (speed and volume), showed too much emotionally, and utilized some inappropriate vocabulary.
Fair

Students were not verbally appropriate (speed and volume), showed some emotional uninvolvement, and utilized no inappropriate vocabulary.
Good

Students were verbally appropriate (speed and volume), showed some emotional involved, and utilized no inappropriate vocabulary.
Excellent

Students were verbally appropriate (speed and volume), emotionally uninvolved, and utilized no inappropriate vocabulary.
Ability to refute

Poor

Team members can not refute any of the question that the opposing team gave them. They also had no refute questions for the opposing team.
Fair

Team members can refute at least one of the question that the opposing team gave them. They also had at least one refute questions for the opposing team.
Good

Team members can refute most of the question that the opposing team gave them. They also had four refute questions for the opposing team.
Excellent

Team members can refute any question that the opposing team gave them. They also had five refute questions for the opposing team.
Use of classroom resources

Poor

The team only used one or less resources and made up their evidence.
Fair

The team made use of at least two of the resources and had some refrences related to their resources.
Good

Team made use of at least three resources and had some refrences related to their resources.
Excellent

Team made use of multiple resources and had many refrences related to their resources.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202