iRubric: Performance Assessment Debate rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Performance Assessment Debate Performance Assessment The rubric assesses an upper level Spanish debate about Bullfighting. It includes the oral debate, written notes on the debate, and written paper stating the student's opinion supported by facts. Rubric Code: A2683W By christyyz Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Performance Debate
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Exemplary 4 pts
Participation	Poor No oral participation. No written notes from the debate at hand.	Fair No oral participation. 2-3 sentences of notes from debate at hand.	Good Some participation (voice heard at least once). 4-5 sentences of notes from debate at hand.	Exemplary Participated frequently(voice heard more than once). Paragraph or at least 6 sentences of notes from debate at hand. Need at least 10 sentences of notes if only participated once
Essay	Poor Argument/Statement is not stated at all. Grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling all have errors. *No relevant vocabulary.	Fair Argument/Statement is vague or unclear. Grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling have frequent errors. *Little to no relevant vocabulary used.	Good Argument/Statement is somewhat stated. Grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling have some errors. *Some relevant vocabulary used.	Exemplary Argument/Statement is clear and easy to follow. Grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling are correct-minor errors. *Relevant vocabulary is used.
Research	Poor No relevant facts or details provided to support the argument of the paper. No citation.	Fair One fact of information supporting the argument of the paper. Little to no detail supporting the fact. *One source cited.	Good Two facts of information supporting the arguments of the paper. Adequate details supporting the important facts. *Two sources cited.	Exemplary Three or more facts of information supporting the arguments of the paper. Adequate details supporting important facts. *Two sources cited.

Keywords:

Performance Debate

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Performance Debate
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Exemplary 4 pts
Participation	Poor No oral participation. No written notes from the debate at hand.	Fair No oral participation. 2-3 sentences of notes from debate at hand.	Good Some participation (voice heard at least once). 4-5 sentences of notes from debate at hand.	Exemplary Participated frequently(voice heard more than once). Paragraph or at least 6 sentences of notes from debate at hand. Need at least 10 sentences of notes if only participated once
Essay	Poor Argument/Statement is not stated at all. Grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling all have errors. *No relevant vocabulary.	Fair Argument/Statement is vague or unclear. Grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling have frequent errors. *Little to no relevant vocabulary used.	Good Argument/Statement is somewhat stated. Grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling have some errors. *Some relevant vocabulary used.	Exemplary Argument/Statement is clear and easy to follow. Grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling are correct-minor errors. *Relevant vocabulary is used.
Research	Poor No relevant facts or details provided to support the argument of the paper. No citation.	Fair One fact of information supporting the argument of the paper. Little to no detail supporting the fact. *One source cited.	Good Two facts of information supporting the arguments of the paper. Adequate details supporting the important facts. *Two sources cited.	Exemplary Three or more facts of information supporting the arguments of the paper. Adequate details supporting important facts. *Two sources cited.